The beneficiary of the estate is my husband. He inherited from his daughter and he was declared the sole beneficiary. His son told my husband that he could not be both beneficiary and executor, so my husband appointed the son as executor. The assets of the estate were deposited in a Merrill Lynch account in August 2005 and are under the name of the executor. My husband has no access to the assets, and only receives a quarterly amount alloted by the executor. The executor has not given the assets to the beneficiary because he was trying to force him to sign an irrevocable trust. There was no will or previous trusts dictating how the assets should be invested. My husband just wants to get total access to the money in the Merrill Lynch account as is his right. This is the reason why he wants to change the executor. But he wants to do this without causing any legal problems for the executor, even if he has misbehaved.
2006-11-28
03:35:17
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Helena D
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics