I dont think I, nor anyone else from Altoona, Alabama will miss him.
Roll Tide!!!!!
2006-11-28 03:34:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by I know, I know!!!! 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think the general consensus among the bama nation is that Mike Shula is a nice guy, and did what nobody else wanted to do and that was take on a sanction ridden Alabama team however with his ultra conservative play calling he just wasn't making the progress that people wanted to see. Everyone loves him and wishes he could have been the turn things around but it just wasn't happening fast enough for everyone. I think given one more year things could have been different but I also think given one more year things could have been just as they are now....mediocre. We'll miss him but if we get someone really good, which is very possible, I don't think anyone will think much about Shula getting fired.
Places like Alabama have every reason to expect greatness. I am an Alabama fan and I live in the Clemson area and you would think that Clemson has won a million national championships (they've won one in 1980) for the way they gripe. They don't have any reason to expect to be great year in a year out. Alabama has 12 NC's, more bowl wins than anybody, and more SEC Championships than anybody. They will never be happy until they are at least competing on that level. Shula never having any head coaching experience was never going to be able to take them to that level. It sucks what happened to him and yes we appreciate him and will miss him but he wasn't the one to take us back to the next level.
2006-11-28 03:42:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by amyclay350 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the world of Mike Shula, he seems like he is about as nice a guy as it gets. But that is also probably the reason he wasn't winning as much as Alabama wants to win, Alabama needs someone more stern.
Roll Tide!!
2006-11-28 04:03:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sean 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not really. Shula was barely above 50% in winning games. The five losses to Auburn and the loss this year to MS State was a killer.
2006-11-28 03:36:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I dont think Bama did Shula right. If they had let him have 1 more year, then next year they'd get prothro back and with him and hall on the outside and a junior JPW, they could have been quite good. but not anymore.
2006-11-28 04:52:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by packerswes4 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
The Invisible Asterisk: Having something to benefit, Shula could desire to probably have remained silent. yet, if ever there have been a case for "the place there is smoke, there is hearth" this recent franchise is it. to quote this 12 months's rule-breaking as New England's in basic terms infraction is to ignore the undeniable fact that they had already widespread themselves as a set that would cheat to win. Have we forgotten the zamboni incident in the Oakland interest? How approximately warming their footballs in the sub-freezing climate against the Titans? McGinest's "injury" timeout in the purple zone to grant the protection a breather whilst the replay confirmed there grew to become into no person close to him? i discover it remarkable that no person is calling or investigating how some years Belichick has been taping combatants. think of roughly it: A group that's knowingly breaking the regulations could be very careful to maintain it a secret. Which begs the question, “had they grow to be so comfortable with it that they permit down their shelter and started taping in finished view of everyone?” It stinks to intense heaven. growing to be up, i grew to become right into a Pats fan. I could desire to be on applicable of the worldwide good now. Brady is dazzling. Moss is enjoying the superb soccer of his profession. yet there is one among those factor as an asterisk that doesn’t look in the heritage books. and there's a ambitious one beside the Patriot call in the minds of people who have been as quickly as New England followers, and finally have been given uninterested in the humorous scent.
2016-12-29 15:00:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋