As far as I can tell - defeat ion Iraq is seen as beneficial to the Democratic party.
Defeat is also seen as more profitable for the news media.
The sad thing is all the people who want to abandon the Iraqi people to the terrorists.
2006-11-28 03:30:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by MikeGolf 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
There is no dishonor in trying to save lives. We were lied to about the real reasons for attacking Iraq and Afghanistan. They were not payback for 9/11. They were carefully orchestrated as part of an agenda developed by Bush Sr. to seize control of oil. Now, after thousands of lives have been lost, the destabilization of a country and countless bombings, murders and destruction, the US has come to its most important juncture. We must leave. It's the right thing to do.
2006-11-28 03:11:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Reo 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Reasons to pull out.
1. We have accomplished nothing as
a. There are more terrorists today than when we invaded
b. More civilians die on a daily basis then before we invaded
c. America went from one of the most respected nations in the world, to one of the most hated and feared.
2. All the reasons shrub gave for going were lies.
3. If you want to police the world, (which I don't, and we can't) there are literally dozens of countries with more oppressive situations than there was in Iraq
2006-11-28 03:14:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by capu 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
all the solutions irritate me as no longer a one in all you noted that it is an undeclared unlawful conflict! awaken, we've been lied to, considered any WMD’s at present? Iraq replaced into no longer a probability or according to probability a valid enemy like North Korea could have been. A conflict with them could have been plenty extra justified yet infrequently needed the two. As for pulling out, the only real protection stress plans I honestly have considered call for turning it over to the UN in something 30 years. You don’t think of they'll abandon the forward bases now that they have spent lives and billions do you? they desire them to help the march to empire to no longer point out the pending conflict with Iran. As for surrendering, that assumes we honestly are combating a real enemy. the only combating we hear approximately are communities that desire us out of their usa. If a distant places ability replaced into occupying our usa wouldn’t you experience an identical? Oops, incorrect analogy as we are being occupied by using a distant places usa. enable’s provide up this petty bickering and honestly help our troops by using bringing them domicile! I don’t opt to work out one extra loss of existence for Bush’s and the different globalist’s interests.
2016-10-13 06:54:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
USA today, suffers from hight defensive dangers just like The Great Britain did in the age of queen Victoria.
Halford Mackinder was the first man who noticed this kind of dangers that suffocate the big unions like USA , the former Great Britain and USSR....
Great Britain failed down because of this kind of dangers.
Now, America suffers from defensive alerts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Cuba, Russia, China, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, Iran....
The former president of USA ,Klinton. knew that USA is commiting big mistakes in the east ,near to China. That's why he started to pull out from there and remove American military bases.
When Bush became the president of USA, he thought that Klinton was stupid and the first thing he did, is re-establishing the military bases again.
Now, USA may fall in Iraq and Afghanistan like USSR did.
you can consider Iraq like puddle of mud... USA may sink in it.
((Sorry if I commited any grammatical mistake...))
2006-11-28 03:34:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Wow you really are narrow minded.
- millions of £££ are being spent each month alone! Our taxes, goverment money
- Troops are pointlessly getting killed in a war that they don't know what they are fighting for. Fact is, there not going to get anything out of it.
- The war is Tony Blairs way of showing G. Bush that he has some kind of power. But even the yanks are saying its a bad idea.
-The more we invade, the more we get involved.
I think you need to think about things before you go shouting ur head off.
2006-11-28 03:12:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by <-tom-> 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well it saddens me that 18 year old boys are dying over there..but on the other hand there is a lot of oil over there (ppl that think the US is trying to get it have absolutely no idea what they're talking about) and the surrounded countries will take it and use the money to spread terrorism. With that resource exploited there is no telling what the terrorists would be able to do with all that profit
2006-11-28 03:06:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by goldengirl 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
Listen to the soldiers that are over there. They dont want to leave until the job is done.
2006-11-28 03:15:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Abu 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes my opinion is that we should pull out of Iraq...maybe for a selfish reason for me would be my husband in Iraq right now. Still i really don't know why we are fighting anymore. Sorry i lost faith in this war..but never faith in our troops. God bless our troops....for doing such a horrible job and being so devoted.
2006-11-28 03:06:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 2
·
2⤊
6⤋
PORK QUEEN wanted her porks her in the USA instead of stealing it in Iraq.
Pork Queen? Nancy Pepsi!
2006-11-28 03:06:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋