This is NOT to confuse those who are temporarily on public assistance while training for a new career, disabled, on government medicare or medicaid due to retirement or again assistance while disabled or training for a new job.
2006-11-28 02:58:40 · 5 answers · asked by Wallaforadolla 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No but I think that if you are pro-life...then you should be required to adopt a baby that currently has no home or family....
the age...race...disablity...none of that would be your choice either.
If you are pro-life----then stand behind it.
2006-11-28 03:01:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thanks Clinton's Welfare Reform Bill: Families no longer get any additional money for having more kids. You get a check for the kids you had when you signed up to benefits and can recieve no more funding for any additional children born 9 months after you started recieving welfare other then foodstamps. Also medical assistance pays for free abortions. So no you aren't being forced to be pro-life.
2006-11-28 03:30:35 · answer #2 · answered by WriterChic 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At this precise moment the only thing
I feel "forced" to do is suggest you open your eyes and your heart and most importantly,ask you why so hateful?
I feel for you~ I hope I am wrong but you sound very narrow minded! YOU are missing out on so much!!
2006-11-28 03:12:08 · answer #3 · answered by Cynthia B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't actually have to have the kids, they just have to convince the government that they did. I invite my nephews and neices over all the time for that purpose alone. I guess your pro-my life, so yeah I guess you are forced pro-life.
2006-11-28 03:01:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is an interesting take on it, but you know you are going to get hosed for this question.
2006-11-28 03:00:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋