Manchester United also have as much money to buy any player they want.But why do people keep on calling Chelsea when Manchester United too are capable of buying any player they want.
2006-11-28 02:41:44 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
What i relly mean is that Manchester United have the money too to buy the most expensive players themselves it is not like they cannot also buy the best Players.
2006-11-28 14:19:28 · update #1
Manchester United also have a richest club but there manager thought that there youngster played the game very well and there main motto is to giving chance to the youngsters.
Chelsea is a richest club because they take those player which is very great footballer. So we can say that Chelsea is a superstar team.
2006-12-05 15:55:00 · answer #1 · answered by NONU 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, Manchester United's treble winners of 1999 were packed with home-grown players. Beckham, Giggs, Butt, Scholes, The Nevilles etc. The problem is that Man. Utd try and build a fair team around youth talent and foreigners while Chelsea plump for the foreign stars straight away. Also, they DO buy players for no apparent reason. Shaun Wright-Phillips is a prime example. They also bid for players just to make the price the other club has to pay go up. It is ridiculous and I can't wait until Roman Abramovich leaves. It will be a great day for World Football.
2006-11-28 02:57:28 · answer #2 · answered by ***L.E.D.G.E*** 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chelsea is much richer then Man United because owner of the club is Aromovich he is the 11th richest man in the world thats why people say they can buy any player but buying good players doesnt make a team good because Real Madrid has the best players in the world but still he loses from other teams like Barcelona and Valencia because he buys 5or6 good players who are playing forward like Raul,Ronaldo,Guti,Robinho a team cannot play with 4 forwards so it is useless to buy big players and keep them on bench.
2006-11-29 01:47:46 · answer #3 · answered by Adil 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Manchester Utd is just saving up. They don't need to buy anymore players because their players are already good enough guys. I mean seriously, they're sitting at the top of the table, 3 points ahead of Chelsea. Why would they need to buy more players?
2006-11-28 06:39:45 · answer #4 · answered by sweetpanther08 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
chelsea are the biggest spending club yet along with Man Utd. The problem is that Chelsea only buy players they dont need and they never use them. While Man Utd spend their money wisely except for that dumb 18 million pound Micheal Carick otherwise they spend wisely.
chelsea just have too much useless money lying around and they just keep on buying and buying.
2006-11-28 04:31:02 · answer #5 · answered by Bilal f 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man u do hav heaps of money but Chelsea do hav a big reputation for buying experienced players. Man u dont show off there money so ppl think they dont hav as much as Chelsea. Chelsea always show off there money by buying new players and basically showing off there team. I agree tht man u do hav money but ppl dont know tht well enough because they hav hardly eva seen the club spend it .
2006-12-04 19:49:46 · answer #6 · answered by Sam M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chelsea are trying to build a team by purchasing some expensive players which is contrary to their previous style. Players came to Chelsea and became famous but now, player who are already famous come to Chelsea. That's why they are being highlighted.
2006-12-05 11:46:32 · answer #7 · answered by Nirajan R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely its looking that way the superb way for the different golf equipment to do it extremely is enable chelsea purchase who there going purchase then th relax can get on with it concepts you besides the undeniable fact that im a huge believer if a participant desires to play for a undeniable club he wil connect them climate chelsea are available with a stupid grant or not if i grew to become into the participant i could refuse connect them so its approximately time gamers started doing that
2016-12-29 14:57:48 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
manchester united ddo not need to buy players just to have them sitting on the bench week after week. chelsea are only buying the top players to prevent other teams from buying them.
2006-11-28 02:45:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
thr reality of the matter is this chelsea are not a rich club in fact in the last two years they have turned the biggest losses in football history over 180 million so in fact the club itself is in hudge debt however its their owner roman moneybags thats rich not the club he bails them out and spends his own cash on players man u have generated most of their own revenue where as chelea have generated nothing
and i support neither club
gooners for life
2006-11-28 08:38:51 · answer #10 · answered by redballs 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋