Which is better TNA or WWE? and Why?

Answer 1

This is a matter of taste. Both promotions have a lot to offer, and a lot of flaws.

TNA has a bigger stable of young talent. AJ Styles and the entire X-Division are what makes watching TNA worthwhile. Outside of that it's mostly washed up WWE/WCW/ECW talent that are getting by on reps earned.

Does anyone know why they keep letting Nash do those stupid skits? Christian Cage a heavy weight title challenger? Sting?

WWE has the cash to keep there biggest name who are still able to preform at a top level. The only young addition of note within the past 6 months is CM Punk in ECW, one of the few new ECW wrestlers who would have fit in the old ECW. For every solid new preformer (Lashley, Orton, Batista, CM Punk) they bring in, they've had one or two clunkers (Spirit Squad, Chris Masters, Eugene, Murdoch & Cade)

DX skits vary, they can be good one week, and boring rehashed material the next. Note: the whole "suck it" thing was a New Age Outlaw/DX stick. Every time HHH and HBK do it makes me wish they'd just come up with something new.

So which is better? If you want tried and true, go with WWE. If you want to see the best up and coming wrestlers, go with TNA.

My nod still goes to WWE, by a hair. Wading thru the has-beens in TNA is a bit of a bother. Still watch both, still miss the original ECW.

Answer 2

TNA is better than WWE.
Anyone who thinks TNA is a training ground for WWE stars has another thing coming because they are wrong.
TNA has wrestlers with amazing athletic abilities, a better ring, better storylines, & that's just a start as to why TNA is better.
WWE has too many squash matches, talking, & BS angles.
Not only that but WWE shows the same thing every week with the same wrestlers fighting the same ones they went against the week before. It gets OLD!
TNA Rules!!!
1. TNA has better wrestlers.
2. TNA has better matches.
3. TNA actually shows wrestling not BS.
4. TNA is more innovative.
5. TNA has a better ring.
6. TNA has the X - Division.
7. TNA doesn't recycle storylines over & over.
8. TNA has better announcers.
9. TNA actually has a Tag Team Division.
10. TNA Pay Per Views are always worth more than the money you pay for them.
This is just some of the reasons why TNA is better!

Answer 3

My vote goes to TNA.

WWE isn't concerned with putting together superior wrestling matches anymore. This past Survivor Series, for example, was a three hour show that featured less than 90 minutes of actual in-ring pro wrestling. That's less than half of the show that is actually spent wrestling, and people have to pay to watch it on pay-per-view.

WWE has turned into a cheap variety show that has very little to do with pro wrestling. It looks more like a Girls Gone Wild infomercial, and the few matches they do have are short and pretty boring.

For my money, however, I pass up WWE and TNA, and will instead buy a ticket to watch Ring Of Honor or buy an ROH DVD.

Incidentally, anyone who says that TNA is a "training ground" for the WWE is an absolute fool who knows nothing whatsoever about the business....or else they're simply a child who doesn't know any better.

Answer 4

I like both because of the variety they both offer. TNA has alot of high flying going on but the WWE has better interaction with the fans. TNA barely leaves there studio.

Answer 5

i think of that storyline sensible the WWE is greater appropriate. They continually have compelling angles for feuds yet they continually arise short while it's time to supply the adventure. Wrestling sensible TNA blows the WWE out of the water. TNA's wrestlers have greater in ring potential then a great style of the WWE Superstars. If TNA might concentration greater on having thrilling fits and compelling storylines then my frequent opinion might exchange.

Answer 6

WWE although the wrestling is better in TNA,but i have been watching WWE since i was like 4 so i am biast to them..even though i hate most of the skits and such nowadays

Answer 7

TNA simply because WWE's Creative Team (Stephanie McMahon-Levesque) can't come up with anything new...they're using storylines over & over again...it's sad, really. and TNA has the younger, up & coming wrestlers... given WWE has ALOT of my favorites, but WWE is fading kinda fast with NOTHING NEW....

Answer 8

I like the WWE,why well that's easy if you think about it TNA is basically just a training ground for soon to be WWE or even ECW superstars.

Answer 9

Wwe is the best because it has more fans and has more shows .
Tna only have one show running. WWE have heat, raw ansd smackdown also ECW is a part of th wwe because they all have collisions on some payperviews.

Answer 10

well i like the wwe more, because of the wrestler and the hole story and show

but tna remind me at the good old wcw