2006-11-28 01:15:06 · 7 answers · asked by Soundguy 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Other - Entertainment
image gets you in, talent gets you a second gig.
2006-11-28 01:16:55 · answer #1 · answered by Tom B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting question, and I think I have the answer. It really depends on the gender.
Male roles tend to be more talent than image. A few good examples of non attractive men that have been lead roles are Nicolas Cage, Steve Bushemi, Paul Giamati, and Tommy Lee Jones. They made it because of talent.
Women roles on the other hand, tend to lean more towards image. Jessica Simpson comes to mind first.
There are of course exceptions. Kathy Bates is superb, yet not classically beautiful. Brad Pitt is okay, but it's his image that keeps people interested.
2006-11-28 09:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Talent because a image might get you noticed but talent will keep you on the top.
2006-11-28 09:22:27 · answer #3 · answered by elaeblue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, image first, talent second. And sometimes the talent doesn't even have to be in the equation!
2006-11-28 09:17:39 · answer #4 · answered by luvmuzik 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Image b/c very few of them have real talent
2006-11-28 09:17:29 · answer #5 · answered by babygyrl11 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Image. Case in point, Britney Spears.
2006-11-28 09:24:25 · answer #6 · answered by Lov'n IT! 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
talent of course
There are some pretty ugly but talented celebrities out there!
2006-11-28 09:19:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋