That it was a controlled demolition?
I mean, HONESTLY, who would be STUPID enough to design a building that would fall to the SIDE in a heavily populated city?
2006-11-27 23:58:13 · 7 answers · asked by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Actually, the ONLY thing experts thought was unusual about the WTC collapsing was that they stood for as long as they did. Sorry, but a plane weighing at least 20 tons, flying at more than 300 MPH is no small force to be reckoned with. That is roughly a mind-boggling 12 MILLION pounds of pressure.
2006-11-28 00:10:12 · update #1
I do not buy the lie for one second. Who are these people that would rather hate their own government than to fight terrorism?
2006-11-28 00:03:09 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The contreversy isn't about it falling straight down as opposed to sideways, it's that if burned for mere hours before collapsing. However, I don't believe that the fall of the building was controlled demolition. I think Bill Maher put it best, "It wasn't a triumph of the human spirit, it was a fuckup of a man on vacation.
2006-11-28 00:07:06 · answer #2 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because Einstein was right the only two things infinite are the universe and the stupidity of himans.
2006-11-28 00:19:18 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lets see here, the buildings are PERFECTLY vertical. How the H ell could they possibly fall sideways? Those people are clinicly INSANE.
2006-11-28 00:14:45 · answer #4 · answered by austrianlegend 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There will always be conspiracy theorists. They can't accept the truth. There will always be authors and movies to fill their need... in search of a buck.
2006-11-28 00:20:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No sh_t !!
Hey, what's with the wackos on here this morning ?
2006-11-28 00:18:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
move away.
move far away.
2006-11-28 00:17:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋