The man has an equal part in making a baby. What if the father wants to keep it and the mother wants to kill it? (oops I mean abort it sorry)
2006-11-27 23:56:29 · 14 answers · asked by Ethan M 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is an ethical question that I have ask myself, while I am against abortion strictly for birth control, and do not think it should be used as such, my question goes both ways should the father of the child be aborted if the father wants it and the mother don't or should it be a mutual agreement before it is done. Either way. In answer to your question I would think that the father should have a say in the matter, after all it is his flesh and blood also. Except in the case of rape and incest which are criminal acts, and should not punished the mother to be for this. I think it should be mutual one way or the other at best.
Edit: excellent question.
2006-11-28 00:03:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i imagine if the daddy needs the youngster, and is prepared to develop it, then the youngster might want to be provided to the daddy. If fathers are required to pay baby help, then so, the mummy pays baby help. little or no is asserted with reference to the rights of fathers, except the actual undeniable actuality that a guy's selection to deliver a being pregnant to time period, does no longer override a lady's selection to abort. also, father's can not chosen to abort a being pregnant, and if the mummy brings the being pregnant to time period, he's now answerable for 21 years of help. adult males attempt to kind regulations that enable them selection, as women individuals are allowed. i do not see that the regulation might want to ever pressure a lady to have an abortion, yet I do see the position adult males might want to correctly be allowed to chosen no longer to financially help a baby he might want to have chosen to abort. besides the actual undeniable actuality that, for the sake of the youngster, i do no longer inevitably evaluate this lifelike, i'll be sure His element. all of it boils all the way down to responsibility. each and every figure should be to blame for his/her personal moves. If 2 human beings made a baby and between the mummy and father needs it, then the different figure is answerable for baby help. it would want to finally end up purely being a count number of economics for each state.
2016-10-07 21:57:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, all things being equal. That is, if the health of the mother is not in danger, if the mother is baove the legal age etc..
2006-11-28 00:01:41 · answer #3 · answered by zymzyv 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's up to the mother, it's her body her decision.
Okay but I don't agree with it lol I think if the father is expected to pay for a child with no rights he should have that kind of say too.
I also don't beleive in abortion
2006-11-27 23:59:46 · answer #4 · answered by brenda4ever 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yeah its a great idea to let a man tell a woman what she can or can't do with her body. Why don't we make Rape legal as well?
In fact, what about a rapist? He rapes a woman and then has the right to tell her she "has" to carry the baby he forced on her. Yeah right.
Would he go through 9 months of exhausting, stressful pregnancy (ie spending half you life with your head down the toilet puking or suffering from pre clampsia or SPD?) and 48 hours of screaming agony to have an unwanted baby? I doubt it.
Tosser.
2006-11-28 00:51:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
yes should be able to say no because it is her body that Cary's this child for months to come and it is she who has to live with the choice of the decision can i provide for his living being the rest of my live. it is she who endeavours the bodily changes and defects from giving birth, so the answer can only lay in the hands of the one Carrier and that is the only one mother of that single child in this whole world (earth)
2006-11-28 00:49:39 · answer #6 · answered by SNOOZE 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree that it doesn't seem fair that only the mother gets to make that decision... it takes two to make the baby and the father would have to pay for 18 years no matter what he wanted if the mother chooses to keep it. HOWEVER, since the father isn't burdened by the growing child and there isn't a way to transfer pregnancies yet, it means that the father doesn't get a say. Seems crappy to me and we should just understand that when you have sex, you are implicitly agreeing to accept the pregnancy.
2006-11-27 23:59:10 · answer #7 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Depends...will he support the girl carrying the baby while she is socially shunned in public? Will he pay for a job loss? Will he pay for any other damage that this 9 months of her life will inflict?Will he pay for the child and her when child gets older?
If no, then no.
2006-11-28 00:02:20 · answer #8 · answered by Barbara 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Sure but he must be required to take financial responsibility, including her lost time at work or school. That is a really tricky question, isn't it!! I think paternity test would be required first.
Nothng is ever simple, nothing is ever just black-and-white.
2006-11-28 00:14:59 · answer #9 · answered by ash 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You can so no as much as you want, but she still the one who must carry it for 9 months.
2006-11-28 00:01:26 · answer #10 · answered by ChaliQ 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋