English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

I feel like everyone else, it is senseless keeping our boys out there. My brother was in Iraq for a while and not a day went by that the whole family did not feel sick with worry about him. He's heading off to Afghanistan soon and that will be just as bad.

On the other hand, we started this war along with Dubya and it is unfair to the Iraqi people if we just storm in, turn their lives and country upside down, then abandon them when they need our help to get back on their feet.

The question is - do they want our help? The media would have you believe that they do not and if this is indeed the case then we should pull everyone out of there and let them carry on.

2006-11-27 23:06:00 · answer #1 · answered by Bel 4 · 0 0

The Iraq war is a no win situation and has been obvious for as long time except to Bliar.
It is easy for Bliar to use other peoples lives to boost his ego and position with Bush.
We are now considered the same as the USA an illegal and cruel occupation army.
We need to get out of Iraq now and that applies to Afghanistan also, where again we are supporting the corrupt puppet regime of Karzai who was an employee of one of the Bush companies.
It was all about the gas pipeline through Afghanistan to India for USA corporate greed, the Taliban would not agree with the price offered by the USA so we have another regiem change.
Days after taking office Karzai signed the contract with the USA for the pipeline.

2006-11-28 00:02:31 · answer #2 · answered by ian d 3 · 0 0

mutually as your helping argument is a sprint soft, your significant element is a competent one. not in basic terms will the two Blair and Bush's life be in significant possibility for as long as they stay, even their nuclear relatives is in possibility. The mafia has not something on the enemies we are dealing with interior the international today. Al Queda is larger prepared, greater advantageous and greater advantageous financed than the Mafia could ever dream of. i'm particularly surprised that somebody in Bush's relatives has not been abducted or assassinated. and on an identical time as quickly as we bypass away Iraq, even 10 ro 2 a protracted time from now, the president and best Minister will nonetheless be in possibility. long after the final soldier or Marine has returned abode, Bush and Blair will nonetheless be in mortal peril. And, amazingly, they knew this entering into. they have positioned themselves and the lives of their families on the line to make us of a of america safer.

2016-10-13 06:39:07 · answer #3 · answered by juart 4 · 0 0

First of all we should get rid of Labour and especially Tony Blair. Then we should look at whats going on with the troops.

2006-11-27 23:00:11 · answer #4 · answered by Tom 2 · 0 0

Tony Blair wants to get a gun in his hand and get over there. If he is not willing to do that then get our young lads and lasses out of there. Theres been wars and fighting over there since long before we even knew the place exsisted. Nothing will stop them fighting, never has done and never will do. I think they just like killing. Also its their country not ours or the yanks. If were a place with no material value it would not have even been discussed.

2006-11-27 23:03:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

lies+oil=power and money(the sad truth is we never went to help)
and we will not leave for years.do you really think bush and Blair
care about loss of life(how Iraq has turned out cant of been a
surprise to the us and UK).They would of seen all scenarios
before they invaded don't you think.two of the worlds most
experienced countries when it comes to war had no idea
there would be a backlash(laughable).This war is illegal
it was when they went in,and it is now.These two men
should be investigated at the very least,for the lies and
fear they spread so easily.the us and British public are
being taken for a ride.(get our soldiers out of that hell
hole now!

2006-11-28 00:08:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's like this. UK pulls the strings US dances. UK King US enforcer. We do what we are told to do because that is the plan to get all the fat cats paid. They don't have to go to war. They send their loyal pawns to go to war so they kill the proverbial two birds with one stone. Make money, population control. UK pound worth more than US dollar make UK masta! US say yes sa masta! We goes to war now. Where you wants us to go? We make big money too. Oh right away masta. So should the UK keep sending troops to die? Yep! They have more to lose than the US.

2006-11-27 23:09:59 · answer #7 · answered by Roll'n Bluntz 2 · 0 0

Look be realistic it now has become a religious war. Look at all the religious wars of the past. It's time to pull out! Or god knows we can be their for another hundred years.

2006-11-27 22:55:18 · answer #8 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0 0

We all know that Tony Blair is a horses ***,,but just think,,who is the boss of our country? Yes you guessed it,,it's HRH,,so should not the question be aimed at you know who

2006-11-27 23:01:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It would be wrong to leave Iraq in its current state. It was wrong to go their in the first place, but it would be a disaster to leave now. We need to see the job through!

2006-11-27 22:53:36 · answer #10 · answered by mark 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers