most of persons have given correct ans but I would give it based on polynomials.
w^5 = 1
so w^5-1 = 0
or w^5-1^5= 0
(w-1)(w^4+w^3+w^2+w+1) = 0
by using x^a-y^a series expansion
as w!=1 devide by w-1 to get
w^4+w^3+w^2+w+1 =0
but above is x
so x = 0
2006-11-28 00:45:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mein Hoon Na 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
THE SIMPLEST SOLUTION
Since w^5 = 1, then w = 1^(1/5), and w has 5 values (the 5 5th roots of 1),
but since 1 is not accepted, then w has 4 values.
This means that w^4 + w³ + w² + w + 1 can have a maximum of 4 values.
We can simplify
x = w^4 + w³ + w² + w + 1 = (w^5 - 1)/(w - 1)
Since w^5 = 1, then
(w^5 - 1)/(w - 1) = (1 - 1)/(w - 1) = 0/(w - 1) = 0
Therefore, the value of w^4 + w³ + w² + w + 1
x = 0
^_^
2006-11-27 22:32:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by kevin! 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hi,
Here's a very simple, sneaky way to do this without long division or anything like that:
look at your equation:
x = w^4 + w^3 + w^2 + w^1 + 1
multiply by w
w*x = w^5 + w^ 4 + w^3 + w^2 + w^1
but w^5 = 1 (as you are told)
so
w*x = 1 + w^4 + w^3 + w^2 + w^1
w*x = x (as the rhs above is what you had in the first place!)
so
w*x=x => w*x - x = 0 => x*(w-1) = 0 => w = 1 or x = 0.. but we are told w is not equal to 1...
I think most of the other respondents are making this too complicated...
2006-11-27 20:48:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by UK_Dave1999 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
x=0. The proofs above for that fact are correct. A more general result is that the sum of the nth roots of 1 is ALWAYS 0. Also, if w is an nth root of 1, then w,w^2, w^3, ..., w^n=1 are all the nth roots of 1. In your example, n=5, but x=0 for any value of n.
Steve
2006-11-27 22:11:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
if z^5 =1 = cos (2k.pi + 0) + i sin (2k.pi + 0)
then z is a fifth root of unity.
The first root is unity, let the next be
w = cos (2.pi/5) + i sin (2.pi/5)
you can observe that the other roots are w^2, w^3, and w^4
then, by summing the geometric series
1+ w + w^2 + w^3 + w^4 = (1)(1- w^5) / (1-w)
since w^5 is 1, the numerator becomes zero and x=0
2006-11-27 21:27:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by yasiru89 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
isn't that fact, a million.00000....a million = a million basically like asserting 10 = thirteen? I mean, equivalent ability precisely the comparable. even in spite of the undeniable fact that they are very very close mutually, they're nonetheless 2 different numbers. No evidence could ever substitute that fact. Math is nice good judgment subsequently. additionally on your evidence on the perfect, the line 10x = a million.000000....a million is fake 10x = a million.00000... a million (that being one decimal to the left) in fact, a million.00000... a million isn't a actual quantity. you desire a definitive like a million x 10^-1000 multiply it by 10 and you get 10 x 10^-999 it would be easier to work out in case you mentioned 9x = 9.0000... 9 the completed equation you made relies upon upon that mistake, with the numbers being wisely elevated you get a different consequence.
2016-12-10 17:35:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If w cannot be equal to one, then w must be equal to negative one for at least one of the solutions available. Therefore (-1^4)+(-1^3)+(-1^2)+(-1^1)+1=x will simplify to-- (1)+(-1)+(1)+(-1)+1=x. The ones then mostly cancel out, leaving you with a positive one value for X.
X=+1
2006-11-27 20:26:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by hallooin_bran 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
w^5 = 1 has five roots, two conjugate complex pairs and 1.
But, you dont want w to be 1.
So,
w = 1/4*5^(1/2)-1/4+1/4*i*2^(1/2)*(5+5^(1/2))^(1/2)
or
w = -1/4*5^(1/2)-1/4+1/4*i*2^(1/2)*(5-5^(1/2))^(1/2)
or
w = -1/4*5^(1/2)-1/4-1/4*i*2^(1/2)*(5-5^(1/2))^(1/2)
or
w = 1/4*5^(1/2)-1/4-1/4*i*2^(1/2)*(5+5^(1/2))^(1/2)
So, in sequence of occurence
w1 =
0.3090 + 0.9511i
w2 =
-0.8090 + 0.5878i
w3 =
-0.8090 - 0.5878i
w4 =
0.3090 - 0.9511i
and again in sequence of occurence of w,
w^4 + w^3 + w^2 + w^1 + 1 = -2.2204e-016 -8.8818e-016i
w^4 + w^3 + w^2 + w^1 + 1 = -2.2204e-016 -1.1102e-016i
w^4 + w^3 + w^2 + w^1 + 1 = -2.2204e-016 +1.1102e-016i
w^4 + w^3 + w^2 + w^1 + 1 = -2.2204e-016 +8.8818e-016i
Thats the answer
2006-11-27 20:48:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Paritosh Vasava 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
w can't equal -1 as -1^5 = -1.
I don't think there is any real value of w if it doesn't equal 1.
2006-11-27 20:32:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tom :: Athier than Thou 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It really depends.
Is this a real question for a class or did you make it up?
If it's a real question there needs to be more information
probably provided in your text book or class. For instance,
what group is w an element of? Clearly it repeats the identity
at the fifth power, but it is impossible to determine x unless
the group elements and relations are known.
2006-11-27 20:26:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋