being a son of superstars why did someone would like to engaged in terrorist act.ithink because he thought he is above the law and he would be able to get out of the system.he knew about the blasts
and instaed informing the police he helped the terrorists.and kept the illegal weapons.is it fair for those who lost thier loved ones in blasts??
2006-11-27 18:00:30 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
He did not engage in any terrorist act, he was young then and as any rich young man with a famous father, he acted like any other rich and spoiled brat by buying weapons in the black market and show off...
It is upto the Indian court and judiciary system to decide about him and his guilt. Certainly, he should receive his fair share of punishment if pronounced guilty.
2006-11-27 18:27:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sanjay Dutt is placing out to look old, yet he's can probable proceed to exist for 5 extra years, your different 2 alternatives are additionally 40 plus actors, what approximately Imran Khan or Shahid Kapoor.
2016-12-14 07:57:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Either you are a terrorist or you are not and the court verdict clearly acquitted him of that charge yesterday in as many words. Possession of a weapon does not mean that you are a terrorist. If that were so there are thousands of people - celebrities, professionals, businessmen, politicians - the list can go on, who own unlicensed guns which of course is against the laws of the land .Guilt and punishment are for the courts to decide. Much as we'd like to pass judgement it is not our prerogative
2006-11-28 19:44:59 · answer #3 · answered by Blackjack 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi bally, It is really sad that it took 13 long years for the case to come up for judgement. It may take another 30 years to punish the guilty.(after appeal & re-appealing in higher courts & numerous mercy petitions from fellow Indians). So who knows wheather Sanjay Dutt will live upto that day for the law to take any action.
2006-11-28 01:53:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
its not fair he is already punished 18 months for only on doubt so now only charge is he is kept arms without license for that may be 18 months jail is en off becoz hear u only have doubt that he is involve in bomb blast but some time u dint no about single terrorist what can u do think it with cooled heart
2006-11-30 11:40:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He must be a nut or foolish enough to hobnob with the undesirable elements. He must have been used to the larger than life lifestyle. Despite his Gandhigiri in the recent film, he must have been living in a world of amoral values. A pampered child brought up in a vitiated and amoral environment.
2006-11-27 22:30:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Sanjay Dutt is guilty ,which I suppose he is!, then he must be given punishment .It makes no difference that he is famous.
According to me, he must be imprisoned in a dark cell,where there is not even a ray of light, and must be made to write the names of all those who have lost their lives, of all those who were waitingfor their chidren [that never returned]with a pen whose ink glitters in the DARK so that he will die of
MENTAL ILLNESS!
2006-11-29 06:08:28 · answer #7 · answered by Inu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about that. Listen dude, these guys lead really odd lives in "la la" land. I don't pay any attention to them.
I definately think that more investigations would be needed to draw up some solid evidence against him.
2006-11-27 18:10:35 · answer #8 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nothing,because that time he was quite innocent.he never act directly or involved in terrorisom.so,if look on his family back ground he must not punished.more ever wait some time and see the result.
2006-11-27 20:24:08 · answer #9 · answered by ms 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wait for some time. You will get the answer.
2006-11-27 18:18:33 · answer #10 · answered by ankur j 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋