English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Also, because of this would you expect any kind of decrease in the value of the house?

2006-11-27 16:57:46 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

8 answers

I would never live in a house that someone died in. I might have seen to many ghost movies, but, I would think the house could be haunted that the person that died had some unfinished business and that his spirit would be in the house. That's what I feel!

2006-11-27 17:26:58 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

In maximum states you've few criminal treatments accessible to you. In actual belongings, that is shopper pay attention - once the call passes to you, maximum words of the genuine belongings settlement legally dissolve - as if there have been not in any respect a freelance in any respect. except that you're literally the owner, and also you're literally to blame for each thing about the belongings - tax liens adversarial to it, upkeep, etc... in case you had a nasty lawyer characterize your purchase, you may want to finally end up paying off the previous proprietor's dishwasher. you may want to disagree with this, despite the indisputable fact that the regulation is sparkling and favourite - and because that is the regulation, it really is ideal. You personal the abode. The regulation says that the flooding is your duty. In idea, think ofyou've got had an inspector seek for previous flood harm, etc earlier you carried out the acquisition. in case you stay in a state that has broking service disclosures, you would might want to teach that the previous broking service knew about the placement - and that is an fairly difficult nut to crack.

2016-10-07 21:45:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think that would be a good thing to know. I would also hope the house value did not decrease, but information like that could leave it on the market for a long time.

2006-11-27 17:00:04 · answer #3 · answered by Raina B 2 · 0 0

It has to be disclosed when you sell a home, that is one of the questions you are asked. Then its up to the person who buys it....if they have a problem with that. I have heard of houses being bull dozed because a horrible murder took place in this particular house and its so well know chances are slim that anyone will ever buy it. Sometime the remaining kin want it tore down due to the bad memories.

2006-11-27 18:52:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That was a question on the paper work when I sold my house. I don't think I would want to know though. I have owned homes before where people died in the house in their sleep.

2006-11-27 17:06:41 · answer #5 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 0 0

I believe something like that must be disclosed in several states already. That probably would decrease the value a bit, because it would be considered a stigmatized property.

2006-11-27 17:02:28 · answer #6 · answered by Flea© 5 · 0 0

It wouldn't necessarily bother me, but if it's the law, you'd better disclose it.

2006-11-27 17:10:31 · answer #7 · answered by drshorty 7 · 0 0

Who really cares? Strangers die every day.

2006-11-27 17:03:32 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers