I think OJ, one because he's not crazy the way MJ is, and two because he had the nerve to write that book! That just makes me really mad, though it's kind of funny in a sick way.
2006-11-27 15:39:59 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
both are nasty
:> peace
.
2006-12-01 11:25:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
They are both very different people so can't really judge.
Likely there's very few offers for OJ to earn extra income and some people would not blame him for accepting a rare opportunity to get a needed paycheck which could pay some bills, help out relatives, leave his children an inheritance etc. He was found "not guilty" and has always maintained his innocence. This hypothetical book should be available as a CHOICE for anyone to either check it out or not. OJ is likely not being narcissistic and a great portion of the book/interview is probably defending himself against false allegations. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.
2006-11-28 17:16:34 · answer #2 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Jackson
2006-11-27 15:42:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
OJ. He tried to make a profit off his controversy. Michael tries to stay out of the public eye for the most part. Any celebrity who does that is fine by me.
2006-11-28 18:29:04 · answer #4 · answered by Leroy Johnson 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly, oj is a double homicide who became convicted of kidnapping, armed robbery and is in penal complex. oj is responsible of thrashing his spouse, he's addicted to discomfort killers, alcohol and is a failure as a porn celeb. oj is responsible oj stealing cable. What became MJ convicted of? no longer something so i wager oj is a million,000 circumstances worse. oj doesn't should have his call in capital letters.
2016-11-29 21:06:54 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jackson
2006-11-27 15:40:54 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Unknown 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If I had to I would keep my kids away from MJ & I would stay away from OJ
2006-11-27 15:43:02 · answer #7 · answered by Angel Girl 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Definitely O.J. because he is guilty!! Michael Jackson was just the object of some gold diggers get rich quick scheme!!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2006-11-27 23:58:21 · answer #8 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
MJ / OJ send them both to space never to return. They are both immoral idiots.
2006-11-27 15:41:54 · answer #9 · answered by amoroushotmama 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Michael Jackson because his victims are still living the nightmare daily forever and too young to defend themselves.The kids did nothing wrong except be there with him,but not there fault again
2006-11-27 15:47:01 · answer #10 · answered by deb m 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
THEY ARE AS BOTH AS BAD AS EACH OTHER LIKE MJ OJ AND even cj carl johnson ll the something js are bad
2006-11-27 15:42:42 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋