2006-11-27 15:07:34 · 13 answers · asked by snashraf 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
anytime there is war against anything it just makes more war so i agree it should be war for peace im not against anything im for good and happiness and for the war for peace
2006-11-27 15:26:33 · answer #1 · answered by ohiobuckndoe 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would fight in a war against terrorism. War for peace doesn't make sense to me.
2006-11-27 15:12:16 · answer #2 · answered by Nelson_DeVon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The correct terminology is War against Islamo Fascists Nazis.
I Cr 13;8a
11-27-6
2006-11-27 20:52:02 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither make sense. War against terrorism is like a War against poverty, you just CAN'T prevent either 100%. Now a war for peace makes no sense because peace =/= war so it's just...wrong.
2006-11-27 15:15:46 · answer #4 · answered by Seung Hee 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's called 'war against terrorism' because we are fighting Islamic fascists bent upon killing as many civilians as they can, until we stampede off the cliff. Islamic fascists are also called terrorists.
In the process of eradicating terrorists, we shall have peace.
2006-11-27 17:21:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
war against terrorism
2006-11-27 15:28:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The abomination in Iraq might want to of not in any respect occurred, yet Afghanistan in justified. despite the indisputable fact that, my opinion on terrorism is that it's not defeated and is used through radical 0.33 international international places as a protection from those that infringe on their lives. maximum radical terrorists from the middle East, Afghanistan, etc will sacrifice 1000's of suicide bombers purely to kill ten individuals. you won't be able to in any respect defeat those who worship death over existence. So, see you later as we save as presence of their lives, the terrorists will proceed to discover approaches to attack. So, the conflict on Terror is yet otherwise of putting forward throwing sturdy funds away after undesirable. decrease back to Afghanistan: we would want to be out of there through now. ignore about spreading Democracy through planting an American sponsored puppet in means. The Russians went broke battling those human beings for ten years, do we truly imagine they're going to fold adversarial to us? we've a tendency to ignore historic previous plenty. Afghanistan change into Russia's Vietnam in that they confronted a foe that would sacrifice 10000 adult males purely to kill ten of them. We confronted that in Vietnam and now we are repeating it back in Afghanistan.
2016-10-07 21:40:30 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it should. You'll be surprised to know that the first idea for Operation Iraqi Freedom was actully Op. Freedom Iraq but they changed it because with the initials you can make Op. Fuel Iraq.
2006-11-27 15:12:02 · answer #8 · answered by The Diver 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are embroiled in a war against people who want to annihilate us because we do not follow Islamic precepts.
Annihilate us = Kill us.
2006-11-27 17:58:53 · answer #9 · answered by Em E 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A. That's an oxymoron
B. That would remove the element of fear in the American people, and that's the whole point.
2006-11-27 15:10:01 · answer #10 · answered by sarcastro1976 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋