English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-27 15:06:52 · 9 answers · asked by morbidsmindtrip 3 in Sports Football (American)

9 answers

NO.........senneca wallace would do worse.......hasselbeck is getting the rythem...........GO SEAHAWKS

2006-11-27 15:09:58 · answer #1 · answered by Justin 4 · 1 0

At halftime they should have put wallace back in because hasselbeck needs time to get back to the game sitituations but he doesnt need to start out with a whole game. They picked a good team to let him play against though. Atleast they didnt pick an abusing team like the ravens or bears. Just protect Hasselbeck and they wont regret having him play the entire game.

2006-11-27 23:28:47 · answer #2 · answered by imsmartkid 6 · 0 0

Obviosly NOT. He played better and better as the game went on. Yes I was getting frustrated too in the first half, but give the guy a chance, he has to get his "legs" back.

Just thank the Gods of Football for Shawn Alexander though. He brough the boys home tonight! 201 yards!

2006-11-28 01:50:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Why should Hasselbeck be benched? Im guessing you think the all mighty Seneca Wallace can lead them to the promised land? Thats like saying Steven's wont drop anymore passes.......Hasselbeck still isnt at 100% and still getting his timing back, he'll be fine.

2006-11-27 23:13:17 · answer #4 · answered by ... 1 · 0 0

No, he's just getting warmed up. Besides, his recievers are dropping passes like Atlantas did for Michael Vick.

2006-11-27 23:11:23 · answer #5 · answered by WestCoastin4Life 7 · 0 0

Why? Seahawks are going to win the game.. :-(

TD...see, I told ya!...Seahawks are coming back. Crap!!

2006-11-27 23:08:53 · answer #6 · answered by c00kies 5 · 0 0

yes

2006-11-27 23:09:55 · answer #7 · answered by bnelson87 2 · 0 0

Seem to be playing fine. what's your problem.

2006-11-27 23:15:12 · answer #8 · answered by teddybear 3 · 0 0

No. He's off an injury.

2006-11-27 23:10:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers