??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
2006-11-27 14:08:20 · 14 answers · asked by cyberwarlocklord 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You mean Jeb Bush? No idea what you are talking about. Why if the word "Bush" in the question there is a 90% chance the question is just idiocy?
2006-11-27 14:13:14 · answer #1 · answered by Griff 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nope.
We already said to he77 with John shoots-self-in-butt -to-get-sent-home-from-Vietnam Kerry.
2006-11-27 22:12:48 · answer #2 · answered by asshat.mcpoop 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
My answer to this question is always the same and it is this:: We do not know what might have happened if Bush was not president and we do not know all the details that made him choose to invade iraq.
2006-11-27 22:30:04 · answer #3 · answered by Amanda B 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't matter if you do or not...he can't run for president again.
8 years is the max for a president to serve.
2006-11-27 22:12:49 · answer #4 · answered by El Bubba 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This place has degenerated to 4th grade name-calling.
Am not. Are so. UH UH. Sheesh!
2006-11-27 22:23:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You know this job might be too difficult for me. No one told me it would be this hard. I want to go back to texas and eat crayons again.
2006-11-27 23:06:51 · answer #6 · answered by Vanilla Face 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
To Hell with Bush! I'll see him when I get there!
2006-11-27 22:12:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why-dont like fighting terrorists or something. Maybe fighting partial-birth abortion was a little too extreme too. Who would u replace him with? Kerry?
2006-11-27 22:11:34 · answer #8 · answered by Daniel 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No, he has done a pretty good job from my point of view
2006-11-27 22:10:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
No we should not.
We should have said that to Clinton after all the lies.
2006-11-27 22:12:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋