Likely there's very few offers for OJ to earn extra income and some people would not blame him for accepting a rare opportunity to get a needed paycheck which could pay some bills, help out relatives, leave his children an inheritance etc. He was found "not guilty" and has always maintained his innocence. This hypothetical book should be available as a CHOICE for anyone to either check it out or not. OJ is likely not being narcissistic and a great portion of the book/interview is probably defending himself against false allegations. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.
2006-11-27 22:57:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by sunshine25 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
hi....properly i heard on the Fox information channel this night that FOX has cancelled the inview with OJ and additionally has Cancelled the e book to. additionally I , MYSELF think of THE OJ IS QUILTY. N ow ten years r extra he desires to jot down this e book???? i think of he's doing all this because of the fact he desires money, he's no longer even thinking approximately his infants and how they might experience, i'm particularly happy THAT FOX DID the splendid factor.
2016-10-04 11:04:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by bungay 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think we have heard the end of O.J. for a while, really who is going to back him on another book, Regan Distributers lost 1.5million on this deal, they still had to pay him , after the public outcry, no-one will want to get involved with this excuse of an Icon.
2006-11-27 15:02:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by glasgow girl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he has the right to write and publish whatever he can. The fact the people don't like it should have no bearing on whether it's published, same thing about the TV show. The best way to fight that sort of thing is to not buy it and read it, don't watch it on TV. Why give him the publicity fighting it?
2006-11-27 13:52:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The man is totally without feeling or honour. Still trying to make money out of murder. Who are his advisors for the love of God?
2006-11-27 20:47:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
His is one of the biggest cases of misjustice I have ever seen, in front of the whole world he got away with it, He is a real piece of work and hopefully one day he'll get what's coming to him,
He's obviously got a superiority complex and wants to be remembered, god knows why, everyone I know thought he was guilty, and he should have had the sense to keep quiet, he's certainly used up most of his 9 lives...,,,
2006-11-28 02:26:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
everyone knows he killed her and her boy friend including him self and now that he is not so famous for doing it years ago he doesnt have the money once he used to take for granted so he will venture into anything that he thinks people will be interested into buying so he can start his fortune once again which will never happen
2006-11-27 14:44:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by treatau 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I was convinced he was up to his neck in it....so good re the book....but even in a free world it would have been a disgrace to have had it released
2006-11-27 13:51:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by BamBamDaddio 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
its pretty rotten and its almost admitting to that he did i. it also shows he has no respect for the victims, their families or himself
2006-11-27 13:54:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by applejack80@sbcglobal.net 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The whole thing disgusted me. He disgusts me.
2006-11-27 13:51:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ms. G. 5
·
1⤊
0⤋