English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-27 13:07:29 · 14 answers · asked by Laughing Man Copycat 5 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

14 answers

I suspect that any one that is a pro lifer and in support of the death penalty should be dismissed as a hypocrite. Pure and simple.

2006-11-27 13:17:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Wow, such an unique question. One we've absolutely not seen earlier... enable me positioned this accessible rather gradual because it variety of feels you people have various of complications comprehend-how. First, a toddler isn't a murdering scumbag who has committed any such heinous crime adversarial to humanity that the awesome penalty must be utilized. 2d, this is not 2 aspects of a similar coin yet you those who seem to have self belief abortion must be a fashion of birth control can't get that with the help of your cranium. Society has the right and duty to handle killers and criminals and the inability of existence penalty is the awesome application of societal will. the straightforward fact is, and that i'm nonetheless preserving it straightforward so that you adult men stand a threat of comprehend-how, that the inability of existence penalty can be a good device in coping with criminals and in deterring destiny acts were it utilized as written. as a replace the liberal attitude of backing criminals and blaming the sufferer signifies that we are compelled to undergo distinct appeals and stretch a procedure out far previous this is mandatory limits. back i do not assume you to tug your head from the sand and face the very incontrovertible fact that your argument is hypocritical and stupid yet no matter the way you try to obfuscate the information they are going to continually will out. No, i do not care what different countries are doing. No, i do not care that lower than a million% of the people on lack of existence row were got here upon threat free. No, i do not care in case you mistakenly imagine that the inability of existence penalty has a racial bias. Do your individual analyze and discover the position both easily bias easily are contained in the criminal justice gadget. Have an afternoon.

2016-11-27 02:52:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well im no preachy fanatic but i fit both those catagories to a certain extent. unless the mother is going to die giving birth i see no reason to deny a child life, be it with his/her birth mother or not. as far as the death penalty i say avoid it except in extreme cases. mass rapists and murders who show no signs of remorse should not be using our tax money to live off of (quite comfortably). its a lose-lose situation. people will justify it by calling killing a criminal vs. killing an innocent but in all honesty its a matter of personal views. many say an unborn child isnt human. i dont believe some serial rapists are either. depends on the way you look at it.

2006-11-27 14:24:18 · answer #3 · answered by invizygirl 2 · 0 0

When God asks "What did you do to stop the slaughter of millions of innocents?", pro-lifers can say we tried. Pro-choice will say" but its a women's right to choose". One messed up their life and landed on death row the other didn't even get the chance.

2006-11-27 14:52:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I love it when people ask stupid questions like this, because they always think they are going to trip someone up and make them squirm.

I will give you a detailed answer to this question, when you can explain to me how killing an unborn child that has not had the chance at life is equal to executing a person who has had a chance at life for crimes against humanity such as murder, rape or pedophilia.

My email is enabled through yahoo!answers. I anxiously await your answer, that is if you are not afraid to face the truth.

2006-11-27 13:48:03 · answer #5 · answered by bowtierodz 3 · 0 0

I would ask why so many Pro-Choicers are in favor of the death penalty, but by that would be a silly question:

So as not to inconvenience the mother!

2006-11-27 13:14:45 · answer #6 · answered by asshat.mcpoop 4 · 0 1

One has nothing to do with the other. Abortion is killing an unborn innocent human being . The death penalty is killing a convicted criminal for punishment, protection of society , and prevention of crime.

2006-11-27 23:24:24 · answer #7 · answered by baalberith11704 4 · 0 0

because many (not all) are dictated by the actions of evangilist preachers gone politician. They have lost the ability to think for themselves, and go around thinking they are better thatn the rest of us, because "God" is on their side. NO matter what apparently, even if they go kill people (crusades, death penalty). And like to take away freedom, and abortion is a choice, so, poof gone!
sorry, hopeless liberal here, i dont mean to personally offend people!

2006-11-27 13:13:31 · answer #8 · answered by purplebadger 3 · 0 2

bc the person on death row obvious did something really bad to get their. the child has done nothing wrong except be conceived when a man and woman did exactly what is needed to happen to conceive it.

2006-11-27 13:11:41 · answer #9 · answered by TJ815 4 · 2 1

Because for them it has got nothing to do with life being sacred, it's all about controlling women.
Most of these people call themselves Christians, but they are full of hate.
As their holy book puts it so deftly: "Thou shalt know them by their fruit..."

2006-11-27 13:14:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers