Why do liberals like to make up elaborate excuses for savage barbarians?

Question

This goes strait across the board, whether it be black Muslim militias in the Sudan throwing living babies in a bonfire,
Middle East Muslims sawing people's heads off,
mothers chasing their kids down and drowning them one by one, you name it, they have any excuse except personal accountability or just being an evil primitive monkey.

Oh, and I forgot, if all blame lays squarely on the feet of the perpetrator, they will deny it all together, 9-11 and 7-7 conspiracies, abortion procedures in detail and the semantics surrounding it, etc, etc.

***lies****

Stewie is a good example of how they deny it all together when faced with the truth,
though I've listed more than a few examples, he denies it and then throws around profanity and personal attacks because he knows it's true. Typical.

Answer 1

Janeyfre . . . whenever anyone attempts to find answers to horrible occurrences, it does not make them "Liberal". Failure of one group (small or large) to understand the grievance of another lead to fiction. The amount of friction it causes can be small or great. If one side is ignorant to certain cultures of the other, and ignore these aspects of life, one stands a chance to offend and make it seem to the offended that it was due to lack of respect. (Be it with fanatics or even a moderate society).

The fact that 9-11 happened should educate us that we obviously pissed a group of people off, enough to get them to kill themselves and take thousands of lives with them. We called them cowards. The people who supported their actions called them Martyrs / Heroes. No one questions what caused 19 people to take their lives? Yes it was horrible, yes, it was the wrong thing to do, yes, we need to find a way to prevent it from happening again, but in choosing to defend ourselves, it is MOST important to learn how not to fester more fanatics/radicals who will be willing to blow themselves up as an act of revenge.

With the middle East burning for decades, (through generations), how can we ever expect to have peace in that region if "WE" the country with the most power continue to play the game that works to promote the growth of these radicals, some of which use religion, or some that simply believe an "eye for an eye" as part of their culture, where revenge becomes their duty.?

If we can't get past the natural desire of payback, then aren't we just following their lead, perpetuating our enemy's goal. . .to make more Martyrs? You say we are Liberals because we look for "cause and effect" (looking for excuses) in what people do. I say if we continue to act like rednecks. . .we can expect to have people wanting to use a saw on it. No excuses. . .just reality. . .it's a shame only a few people realize this. . .(on all sides) . . .

E LIB o NATOR Your statement about abortions show how some people can be so callous in their thinking. This goes against the grain of rational thinking and places you in a group not centered on reality. I would assume you believe that statement because you listen without asking questions (as a liberal would do (to find excuses)). Try to really think about what you wrote, and then find one person that LIKES abortion. . I'll wait. Meanwhile, do you ever do anything you do not like to do? Have you ever had an injection? Have you ever sat in a dentist chair? So, just because you do these things, it does not mean you like it. Think before you write, our view of you depends on what you state. If you still think you are correct. . .then maybe you can understand how a terrorist mind works. . .by being BRAINWASHED and without rational thought.

Answer 2

there is little moral or noble about conflict, in the first position. Raiding is even a lot less so, if that is accessible. despite the indisputable fact that, the Norse (Viking might want to be considered as a verb, no longer a noun. They were Norse, and they from time to time went a-Viking), were regularly farmers and investors. at the same time as they'd a needed inhabitants explosion, then the shortcoming of probability, they lack of lands and the shortcoming of ladies individuals led them to concentration better on raiding. At one element, the Norse had an pretty huge inhabitants boost, and for a era of quite a few generations, they better their administration, finally conquering maximum of england. In that conquest, the Norse were really fierce raiders (besides the actual undeniable actuality that the time period barbarian might want to correctly be off base. the individuals they raided adversarial to, after all, were truly purely as barbaric because the Norse) and fierce warriors, and they likely took the surviving women individuals as their personal, yet that is about par for the direction on the time. the way the Saxons behaved is plenty better in protecting with the perception of the brutal invaders you element out. ultimately, the point i'm making is that the Norse were better civil and better honest than the detrimental money owed cause them to out to be, yet i do not recognize if there's a lot noble about raiding villages and stealing each and every thing you are able to. in case you want to envision some actual undesirable adult males, in words of human rights on the time, despite the indisputable fact that, look at the Saxon invaders of england. As to the Serbs and Kosovo and all that. i imagine that they are likely no longer doing something that hadn't been finished earlier through maximum easily everyone, yet... it truly is the 21st Century, and that type of habit is something we would favor to imagine we carry as below us. I truly have childrens. My eldest son is serving as Rifleman in Iraq, and my eldest daughter is a blackbelt in akido. i might want to favor to imagine that when I fell thinning the ranks of an attacker, that they'd do precisely effective protecting themselves, and can want to have an exciting selection of trophies to teach off at the same time as it change into finished.

Answer 3

If liberals support the genocide in Darfur, how come "liberal" groups such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have condemned it? How come Mr. George "Hollywood liberal" Clooney has made it a personal cause?

What liberal leader or Democrat has ever made a speech or funnelled money into Al-Qaeda? Can you prove it?

Answer 4

If 100% of Muslims are terrorists, then so are 100% of Christians, and 100% of just about any group you care to mention. There are many Christian terrorist groups - the IRA, 'pro-life' bombers, animal rights campaigners, the KKK - and do all Christians stand up as one and denounce these extremist groups? Why, no they don't. Some of them even sympathise and fund them.

I do not apologise for terrorists - those who kill indiscriminately are evil, no doubt about it. What I do apologise for are those innocent people you tar with the same gargantuan brush of "Muslims are barbarians and terrorists". Presumably you bought it from the same shop Hitler bought his "Jews are filthy money grabbing degenerates" brush from.

Answer 5

It is unbelievable to me that, regardless of ANY grievance or ideology or any other alleged reason, people can try to defend the tactics of indiscriminately murdering thousands of innocent men, women and children.
Just unbelievable.

Answer 6

You forgot Americans who invade a country and facilitate the deaths of nearly 200,000 Iraqis. I suppose that is OK because the conservatives got this mess up and running.

Answer 7

You conservatives sure like to raise a big stink about stuff,don't you??Quit acting like 4 year olds,we're ALL Americans.

Answer 8

examples please.
the idiots on this site have this problem with lumping everyone together.
from your question i say you are an idiot. now does that make all conservatives idiots?

Answer 9

Birds of a feather flock together.
They like abortions and that is barbarianism too.

Answer 10

isn't it obvious? they want to die.

I mean maybe they want to act like everytihng is ok, but my belief is we should go after every single threat to this ocuntry and its people as quickly as possible.