then why did she not strike a private settlement of what would obviously have been several millions of £. It's proof positive that she's after money, isn't it !?
2006-11-27 10:48:38 · 17 answers · asked by barry-the-aardvark 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
true- if it was a more private settlement then it would be a little bit more honest than holding press conferences to announce a stupid divorce. Did you hear that she said he wouldn't let her put a bed pan under her bed and made her crawl to the toilet in the middle of the night? What bloody nonsense! Imagine the ridiculous sight!
2006-11-27 11:16:08 · answer #1 · answered by antagonist 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have never believed the story that she hadn't heard of the Beatles. I was born in 1966 when they had stop touring and was still little when they split, yet even I knew who they were all my life. Especially as Paul is called an ex-Beatle every day and he still tours. Would she not have realised in 1980 when he'd been arrested in Tokyo or later when John was murdered? She is not only a gold-digger, she is a blatant liar!
2006-11-27 11:14:10 · answer #2 · answered by Pixxxie 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I read that she turned down either 30 or 50 million, and that she wants half which is estimated to be around the 400 million mark. So yes that is indeed proof enough.
2006-11-28 01:15:11 · answer #3 · answered by georgeygirl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She may have been quite attractive to look at. But anyone who actually watches those cringe worthy interviews she gave on Richard and Judy can plainly see the hard steely cold faced biitch she actually is. I remember her telling them that shed never even heard of the Beatles before she met Macartney.
I havent got much sympathy for Macca as everyone including his family appear to have warned him about what he was getting in to. Its a shame someone as respected as him has had to go through all this shiit.
2006-11-27 22:45:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm confused by the hate directed towards Heather. Are you all personal friends of Paul and know exactly what kind of man he is? Er....no. Frankly, he comes across to me as a smug git. I'm not a big fan of Heather either but why the vitriol? IN all divorce settlements, the richer partner pays the less rich. Blame the system. Not her.
2006-11-27 11:03:05 · answer #5 · answered by Katya-Zelen 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
In any divorce settlement, the wife is entitled to a certain amount. We just get all weird when it involves a lot of money.
2006-11-27 10:57:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cos she's not only a gold digger, he's a psycho ho ***** who craves the attention!!!!! Like Jonothan Ross said, we'll find out she's been lying about only having one leg next!
2006-11-27 12:29:33 · answer #7 · answered by KidTechnical 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's always about the money. Give me 40 or 50 million and I'd be happy!
2006-11-27 10:52:15 · answer #8 · answered by Angie 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
definately a gold digger. why would a captivating, youthful female "fall in love" with an previous guy till he had various of money. like anna nicole and that previous guy she married....it became inquisitive about the money.
2016-11-29 20:53:49 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh believe me, that skag is most certainly a gold digger and she's clearly holding out for the most money she can get from Paul.
2006-11-27 10:50:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋