because he believes that banqua knows too much as he was there when the witches told macbeth his prophecies and so i think there is some fear of banquo that macbeth holds and so rather than takling it he decides to simply discard it by hiring men to kill both banquo and his son (as his son is suppose to become king)
2006-11-27 10:18:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kristin H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
MacBethe arranges for Banquo and his sons murder due to the prophecy the witches told Banquo, basically that his sons would be king. Macbeth, wanted his own line to continue as kings so set out to kill Banquo and Fleance (Fleance escaped). L
Lady McB gave him the balls to go and do it, goading him into the actions
2006-11-27 10:29:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Travellin Bry 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the beginning: Macbeth makes a decision to kill Banquo and Fleance because of the fact the witches prophesied that on an analogous time as Macbeth himself could be king, it replaced into the descendents of Banquo which could be kings down the line. In different words, the kingship won't stay in Macbeth's line together with his teenagers being kings after him. To clinical care this, Macbeth makes a decision to have Banquo and his son killed so that they might't take the kingship from him. no longer in basic terms like the homicide of Duncan, female Macbeth has NO section in the homicide of Banquo, that's amazingly important. earlier this factor, it replaced into she who persuaded Macbeth to kill, yet now Macbeth is stepping out on his own and making judgements. He even tells her "Be harmless of the certainty until thou applaud the deed"; in different words, he even saved the plans for the homicide a secret from her until it replaced into over and performed with. The quote, "i'm in blood, stepped in so some distance which could I wade not greater, Returning have been as tedious as pass'oer" is, like Banquo's homicide, a pivotal 2d for Macbeth. What he's asserting is that he's complete lots and killed this form of great style of those that he might besides keep killing. The metaphor he's making use of is him status in the midst of a large puddle of blood, asserting, "Shoot, i might besides pass forward and do what i've got have been given to do because of the fact i would be unable to turn around and pass returned." that's extremely important to his character because of the fact in Acts I and II, he felt sooo in charge over killing Duncan that he could fairly do it. that's showing his ethical progression - decline!- because of the fact he isn't any longer feeling in charge for what he's complete he's desperate on being king and gaining potential.
2016-12-13 15:21:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by jowers 4
·
0⤊
0⤋