English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Pretend there are no other choices. Which of the two has the better qualifications for the job and why?

2006-11-27 08:29:42 · 36 answers · asked by layla 2 in Politics & Government Elections

36 answers

they are good probabilities

:> peace
.

2006-11-30 18:52:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Neither Condoleezza Rice wouldn't be any good her degree is specializes in Russian politics/policies. So she would not be good for handling Middle Easter nations(mainly Iraq/Iran) or North Korea. Hillary I just don't like Hilary I mean really those Dems don't know what to do about Iraq or any other nation we have problems with. We need a person that is a very strong leader and very educated (especially when it comes to knowledge of other nations and knowing foreign languages) and can make good sound decisions. Neither or them are good presidency candidates.

2006-11-27 08:40:09 · answer #2 · answered by . 6 · 0 0

If it were just the two of them running, I'd vote for Condoleezza Rice. Just because I think that Condoleezza Rice would make a better President than Clinton.

2006-11-27 09:08:40 · answer #3 · answered by Marenight 7 · 2 0

Condi. She is a very intelligent person and works off that intelligence. She has had plenty of experience in the White House. She is also a nice person, not mean and I believe would tell the truth. Hillary is an unknown because she's totally political and flips flops to engineer votes. But she can't really change who she is on the inside. Everybody has been complaining about dirty politicans. Why not have someone who is not a politician?

2006-11-27 08:49:07 · answer #4 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 1 0

That would be an amazing presidential race, that's for sure.

Both women are qualified. They're both exceedingly bright.

Hillary became a successful lawyer at a time when women weren't yet all that welcome in the courtroom.

Condi was the president of Stanford University, if I remember correctly (whichever school Chelsea Clinton attended, as Hillary mentions Condi in her biography).

Both women have extensive backgrounds in politics and have been intimately involved in the operations of the White House. Both are familiar with international diplomacy as well as the local domestic scene.

There are few people in this country with better qualifications than these two women.

I'd vote for Hillary.

2006-11-27 08:37:57 · answer #5 · answered by jplrvflyer 5 · 2 2

I think Codoleeza is more qualified because she is already working at the Federal level. Hillary was First Lady (which I don't think qualifies as an office) and is now a Senator...Condoleeza works closely with the President and the rest of the government.

But I would not like either as my President...

2006-11-27 08:44:43 · answer #6 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 1 0

Hillary Clinton, for a variety of reasons. First, it would be so cool to see a former President as the.... First... Gentleman... (what would you call the male counterpart to "First Lady?") Second, Hillary has considerable experience, having been the First Lady, and having served as a US Senator. She has a law degree from Yale Law School. Finally, she is a wife and mother, which allows her to relate to family and domestic issues.

Condi -- she is an academic with hardly any political experience. Her role as Secretary of State is strictly for show and PR for the Bush White House. She has no advanced understanding of US Law or the US Constitution. She has never been married, and she has no children. Finally, she had a Chevron Oil Tanker named after her, which was conveniently and quietly renamed, lest the American public think that there were undue influence by the oil industry upon foreign policy.

2006-11-27 08:39:16 · answer #7 · answered by Jack C 5 · 2 2

As far as qualifications, both have what is needed and then some. These two both present very good choices and I would be happy with either. But my personal politics tend to be liberal, so I would go with Hillary Clinton. But Condoleeza Rice I would certainly be proud of, even if I disagree with her on occasion.

2006-11-27 08:34:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Condi Rice. No other choice. Hillary Clinton is a power mongering evil being. The only reason she puts up with Bill's indiscretions is to save her career. God help all of us if Hillary is President. Condi is Secretary of State. Hillary was the First Lady and now the junior senator from a state that would elect a rock if you wrote democrat on it. Please, if you have any brains left America, forget Hillary.

2006-11-27 08:38:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Condoleezza Rice should be the next president.
Not Hillary! She's got good team working abilities with other cultures and knows how to bring peace to other countries.

2006-11-27 08:32:52 · answer #10 · answered by Cuddly Lez 6 · 4 4

Condi. She has core values. Hillary does not.

2006-11-27 09:44:49 · answer #11 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers