English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I personally think that when people do wrong, they should pay for it!!!

All the do-gooders have to object for the sake of objecting.

i am british but i can see why some countries are in a right mess (including the UK)

DDo i have a wrong thinking pattern or what?

2006-11-27 08:26:23 · 7 answers · asked by ballet-babe 3 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

7 answers

I would kill a human any day over an animal, you are 100% in tune.

2006-11-27 08:29:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

The problem with your proposition is twofold.

First of all, it is far more beneficial to society if criminals are reformed instead of tortured. All torturing criminals is going to do is make caught criminals worse, make uncaught criminals desperate, and in many sense degrade the society that performs it. And don't kid yourself: 'making criminals pay' and 'hurting' them is little more than persecuting some group for your own amusement.

Secondly, you seem to have the completely erroneous idea that only guilty people are actually found guilty. There are multitudinous examples of exactly the opposite. Just about everyone should be well aware that there are plenty of people in jail who are completely innocent of the crimes that they have been charged with. So given that we KNOW we have innocent people in jail, is it really appropriate to put the hurt on them? Or should our standard of treatment be one which an innocent person would not find objectionable but which can help reform a guilty person?

As far as animals... as far as I can tell it is IMPOSSIBLE to live a life which does not torment some animal somewhere, whether you see that critter or not. Even if you choose not to eat dead critters, the vegetables you eat are probably cultivated on what used to be a critter's house, and thousands of critters were poisoned, fenced, or beaten away so they couldn't eat it first. Not to mention your own living and workspace.

I'm not saying that justifies futher cruelty to animals - it doesn't. But it does mean that we cannot simultaneously have a world with no cruelty and where we continue to exist. The ideas are mutually exclusive.

So yes... I believe your thinking may be a bit off. But I respect your desire to eliminate at least some portion of cruelty in the world. That's a good thing! ( :

2006-11-27 16:38:40 · answer #2 · answered by Doctor Why 7 · 0 0

Boy are you naive, people kill animals by the millions everyday. You might be Shock, but then they sell parts of their bodies in stores in USA called Supermarkets or Grocery Stores. We have Professional KIllers---Meat Cutter and Butchers. And then worst of all--- animals are eaten, yes eaten in large room called a Restaurants or taken home. Prepared in the biggest crime all of The Family Dinner. This must stop!!!!!!!!

2006-11-28 14:42:23 · answer #3 · answered by artman 2 · 0 0

Death is Death to Animals or Humans!!! The Problem is with crime and criminals is their not always guiltily! People--- Jury's and Judges make mistakes! Bottom Line is "T"!
Because almost No one can Stand to see Animals or People done that Way!!!

We Need to Find a better Way!!!

Waho!!!

2006-11-27 18:38:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is a law here in america that prevents cruel and unusual punishment, to keep people like you from becoming judges and playing your sick little torture games with peoples lives.

But hey, they tortured people in Germany, and look how well that went.

2006-11-27 16:40:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You have the right idea. No one should ever hurt an animal. It's just wrong.

2006-11-27 16:33:33 · answer #6 · answered by Kayla [(Adam)] 4 · 1 0

I'd rather not hurt anyone, unless they deserved it... people might call 'an eye for an eye' unfair, but infact its the only fair way.

2006-11-27 16:30:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers