Why ramming police cars are NEVER a good idea...?

Question

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/11/27/answers_sought_in_ny_police_shooting/

White/Black/Poka-dotted, it's never a good thing to ram law enforcement. Someone was probably drunk(was drinking H20 at the strip club?), and decided to get away at his own peril.

A tragedy, yes. Does this merit Sharpton to blow off steam because someone made a very poor choice(and it could be BOTH sides)?

Only if you need to stay in the spotlight. Nothing will change from this. Absolutely NOTHING will come from this, as the human being has been what it has been for thousands of years, and will continue to do so, regardless of the farce we call "civilization"

Answer 1

You have no idea what you are talking about, and you obviously didn't look into the details of the situation. There's still a lot that people don't know, but There is no reason for Police to shoot at a unarmed car 50!! times. PLUS-- The NY police department's policy on shooting at moving vehicles states: "Police officers shall not discharge their firearms at or from a moving vehicle unless deadly force is being used against the police officers or another person present, by means other than a moving vehicle." The Police knew better not to shoot.. Why do you think they did it???? - its obvious.

Answer 2

If you are referring to the incident where the groom was shot outside of the night club by the cops, It is believed that the cops vehicle was rammed only after the individual that was driving was shot. It might have been a reflex, only the dead driver could tell, and right now he is not talking. Yes Al Sharpton is a loud mouth publicity grabber, but if he get the attention needed to bring this matter out into the "true" light, let him be. No it is not a good idea to ram a police car, but before judging, look at all the angles here.

Answer 3

yea


he is refering to the mayor who called it ecessive force

if he is making the judgement b/c of 50 shots and only three unarmed people as of yesterday they were saying that there could have been a 4th person. and the cops are taught to fire until they feel that they are safe and no longer theatened. so until they have spoken to all the cops and deterimined if there was a 4th person it is still a matter of opion and there could be alot of histiled and then people might not feel safe with the cops.

my feeling the cops were theatened and did what they had to.what everyone is forgetting that they said there might have been a 4th person....maybe there was a gun and he took it. and if they already hit and undercover cop and hit an undercover police car the other cops had every right to feel theatened and do what ever they felt they had to do. and lets not forget that there was more then one cop there so its not like all 50shots came from one officer.now dont think that i dont feel bad that that guy died but. he wasnt "un armed" he had a car that could do as much damage if not more then a gun

Answer 4

YOU KNOW THAT ANYTHING INVOLVING A POLICE SHOOTING IS GOING TO GET FATSO THE RACIST INVOLVED. I FORGOT A FEW YEARS AGO A WHITE KID WAS SHOT BY A BLACK COP & YOU DIDN'T HEAR A PEEP FROM LARD BUTT.

Answer 5

I agree.

Answer 6

and then they still claim they were unarmed,