English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A freedom can be restricted if it represents a clear and present danger to the public.

2006-11-27 07:56:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

8 answers

true. you cant yell fire in a crowded hall with out getting into trouble!!!

2006-11-27 07:59:06 · answer #1 · answered by george 2 6 · 1 0

Your so called Freedom is a crock of shiit.When they can rip it All from you in a blink of your eye.Then treat you like the lowest life form that ever walked the earth.
Wow,sure sounds like True Freedom to me...NOT!

2006-11-27 16:18:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So if they say true, nobody can go out of their homes because they would have an accident. You can't get the restritions so far.

2006-11-27 16:06:23 · answer #3 · answered by redkite 6 · 0 0

True. Think about that for one whole minute....If it still boggles you how that's possible, consider moving out of the country.

2006-11-27 16:06:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who decides if it is dangerous?

2006-11-27 15:59:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

True.

2006-11-27 15:58:17 · answer #6 · answered by teel2624 4 · 0 0

true

2006-11-27 16:04:15 · answer #7 · answered by Lara <:(((>< 4 · 0 0

well if freedom was freedom u could do as u please

2006-11-27 16:01:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers