2006-11-27 07:38:56 · 6 answers · asked by BOBBY B 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Teaching
Aside from it didn't paint black people in the best light, you got me. And in all fairness, we added the race thing to what OJ did. Personally, I saw that as a ex battle that went very awry (as a matter of understatement), but he didn't kill her because she was white. If he killed her (while I now think he did kill her, I could still see some people thinking he didn't), he killed her because he saw her as cheating, not because of the color of her skin.
Beyond that, I don't see any connection between what Michael Richards said and what OJ did.
2006-11-27 07:48:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I thought your question was a bit odd, so I clicked on it, just to see what kind of answers you received.
I think Fancyname put it best.
Otherwise, I see no similarities between Richards' stupid, racist remarks and OJ's attempt at "blood money" with his book.
Apples and oranges, as far as I can see...
2006-11-27 09:48:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both examples of how [some] black folks try to get away with everything and continue to PLAY THE ROLE OF THE VICTIM in every freakin' thing.
Yes, I know that there are people of all backgrounds who behave this way and it is completely unexceptable.
2006-11-28 02:15:25 · answer #3 · answered by HazelEyes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fame does not make for intelligence or humanity
2006-11-27 07:59:54 · answer #4 · answered by fancyname 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People mess up and make mistakes, maybe??
2006-11-27 07:48:56 · answer #5 · answered by suzieq_64093 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm sorry, WHAT?
2006-11-27 07:40:58 · answer #6 · answered by toff 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋