Can a supermarket refuse to sell you more than two packets of paracetamol, on legal grounds?

Answer 1

This legislation came into force on 16 September 1998.

It limits the maximum pack size of solid doses of paracetamol and aspirin for general sale to 16 tablets or capsules. It also limits the maximum pack size of solid doses of paracetamol and aspirin to 32 tablets or capsules in pharmacies.
***The sale or supply of more than 100 aspirin or paracetamol tablets or capsules at one time requires a doctor's prescription.
The sale of more than one pack is not illegal, but where it resulted in an overdose the adverse publicity would of course be serious for the vendor.***
These measures will not stop anyone from going from shop to shop to buy as many packets as they wish. However, since the purpose of these changes is to reduce the quantities of these products stored in the home, it would be sensible to limit general sale of paracetamol or aspirin to one pack at a time.
*****Some retailers have introduced a Code of Practice or have programmed their tills to prevent multiple sales.******

Answer 2

Yes, in fact any shop that sells paracetamol cannot sell you more than 32 tablets at a time. Not sure about chemists, they may sell you more after giving you advice. Paracetamol will cause liver damage if taken in large amounts.

Answer 3

Yes - its to stop you overdosing - but as previously stated - you would visit more than one shop if yoiu really wanted to do it. It's the shops that refuse to sell you more than 2 packets of ibuprofen that kills (!) me - you will get a really sore tummy but it wont kill you - unlike paracetamol which if it doesn't kill you can leave you very ill.

Answer 4

They are not supposed to sell you more than the amount which could cause an overdose. Paracetamol overdose is particularly horrible as it can leave you n pain for life.

Answer 5

yes my girlfriend got a diciplinary at work for selling 3 packets to a mystery shopperstupid rule really when u can go into a different shop and buy more

Answer 6

Yes - they can put limits on the number of a certain item you can buy. Just think of when the PSP came out and people could only buy one. In addition, certain cold medicines are limited because they are used in the manufacture of crystal meth. Many other similar limits can apply.

Answer 7

it really is a complicated question. in protecting with what courts have governed in the previous--no. First--for a pharmacy to refuse is illegitimate. era religious freedom extends in straight forward words to persons and exceedingly religious communities. A for-income agency does no longer have a top to "freedom of religion." human being pharmacists are somewhat better complicated situation. assume, for the sake of argument, that they belong to a church that teaches they ought to no longer promote contraceptsives, on an same time as an worker. that is a precondition--the regulation does no longer enable someone to jsut up and determined arbitrarily that something is "adversarial to my faith"--you may want to teach you do belong to a religious team that does, truly, teach what you're putting forward. 2d, the pharmacy can--and many times do--set as a artwork rule that each and every one orders, etc. will be crammed. that is a project of being employed--and the guy is obligated to stay with the words they agreed to at the same time as employed. For an worker to "replace inheritor thoughts" after beginning artwork isn't a "religious top'' its no longer secure through the first modification. In similar circumstances, frequently the courts have take n note of two project. One is at the same time as a pharmacy is the only lifelike source of drugs (as in a small rural city). Now save in thoughts--prescriptions are not from now on written through pharmacists. really they haven't any criminal powr to do something yet fill orders from docs. The courts received't enable hem to overrule a well-being practitioner's order on any grounds. The criminal wondering right it truly is that someone is loose to practice their faith --yet no longer to the quantity of demonstrably reason harm to others. A pharmacists i no longer qualified to rule on a prescription. they're order takers, no longer doctorss. In a case in which a pharmacist isthe sole service fairly available--they do no longer have a top to refuse to fill a prescription--any prescription, except for particular clinical causes. the different project is at the same time as a pharmacist isn't the in straight forward words source. if so you are able to make an fairly solid case for a top of refusal through someone. really a agency might want to conform to allow someone to refuse service see you later as yet another pharmacist is on responsibility to fill the order--that would surely be perfect less than the regulation. no matter if a agency might want to to allow it really is a community the courts have not addressed so a approaches as i recognize.

Answer 8

yes silly really its to stop you overdosing but if that's what you wanted you could just go to another till and buy more yes i know how annoying i needed more than to products but because it contained paracetamol she said she couldn't serve them me

Answer 9

No idea since you don't tell us what country/state you're in. I suppose they have the right to limit quantities of anything.

Paracetamol is just acetaminophen, so it's not a controlled substance.

Answer 10

YES.... cos they could/can be responsible to coursing your ill health ( like they have morrels ) of some sort