English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Show that (sigma from k=1 to infinite)1/k is infinite but that (sigma from k=1 to infinite)1/k^2 is finite.

*instead sigma notation which I was not able to place here, I indicated it with (sigma...)

2006-11-27 06:43:03 · 2 answers · asked by Eric 1 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

I got this answer from someone here. but I was told this is not enough proof. I think the transition from sigma to integration is not fully explained. can someone help?

take the anti-derivative of the first summation and you get:

ln|k| from 1 to infinite

this is equal to infinite.

take the anti-derivative of the second summation and you get:

1 / -k from 1 to infinite

this would be equal to:

(-1/infinite) - (-1/1) = 1

2006-11-27 06:44:52 · update #1

2 answers

These are quite famous problems. As you mentioned, you can do it with integration; thats probably the simplest way.

In order to see why that works, lets call f(x) = 1/x or 1/x^2 depending on which one you want.
Draw a 'histogram', where each of the bars is 1 wide, and has height 1/(left x value). So you have a bar from x=1 to x=2 with height 1, x=2 to x=3 with height 1/2, etc.

Now if you draw the curve f(x), it never goes below any of these bars. So the integral of f(x), which is the area under the curve, must be less than the total area of each bar, which is that infinite sum. So if we get a finite integral, we have must a finite sum.

Similarly, you could draw a histogram where each bar has height 1/(right x value). Then the curve is always *below* the bars, so you get a lower limit. Then if that integral is infinite, the area must be infinite.

Anyway, now that we've got the official answer sorted, there are many other proofs. Heres a nice one for the 1/k case:
= 1 + 1/2 + (1/3 + 1/4) + (1/5 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8) + ...
>= 1 + 1/2 + (1/4 + 1/4) + (1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8) + ...
= 1 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + ...
which goes to infinity.

As a side note, the actual sum of 1/k^2 is pi^2/6. That always interests me - if you draw a whole bunch of circles with radius 1, 1/2, 1/3, .., then their total perimeter turns into the 1/k-type sum, and is infinite. However, their total area turns into the 1/k^2-type sum, and is finite. So you can't draw the outline of the circles, but you can colour them in.. ;)

2006-11-27 08:06:59 · answer #1 · answered by stephen m 4 · 0 0

advice one million: Draw a sketch. advice 2: employing your notation, evaluate S(0 to -x) f(s)ds. replace s = -t, and so ds = -dt, and as s is going from 0 to -x, t is going from 0 to x, and so the essential is such as -S(0 to x) f(-t)dt If f is even, f(-t) = f(t), so S(0 to -x) f(s)ds = -S(0 to x) f(t)dt, meaning it extremely is an odd function. (s and t are "dummy" variables -- it makes no great distinction what letter is used. the essential is an analogous if we write S(0 to x) f(p) dp) Likewise, if f is unusual, f(-t) = -f(t) and so S(0 to -x) f(s)ds = S(0 to x) f(t)dt, which exhibits this could be a competent function. advice one million grew to grow to be into extra advantageous useful than a facetious protecting workout. watching the sketch you recognize this curiously remarkable effect. in spite of the reality that with a competent function the two aspects, equivalent in importance, are on an analogous portion of the x axis and so we'd think of of they could desire to be equivalent, mandatory from 0 to a unfavorable fee is going applicable to left extremely of left to applicable, so the effect of the essential has the countless sign.

2016-12-29 13:55:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers