c. Velocity will have size and direction.
2006-11-27 05:25:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by smci 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, if the Earth weren't accelerating, there would choose to be a rigidity which counterbalances the solar's gravity, and there is not any longer. whether Earth have been in a uniform orbit, it would choose to be accelerating. we are able to degree our place relative to distant stars to choose that we are nearer to solar in some seasons, and added from the solar in others. We account for this with Kepler's variety of elliptical orbits, shown by calculus and Newton's rules. the two point out, nearer to the solar = extra effective translational kinetic power, much less GPE = swifter tangential velocity.
2016-10-04 10:33:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
b,c are true.
when u are saying velocity is same as acceleration did u mean both are vectors,if so then d is also correct.
2006-11-27 06:00:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by raven 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
c. Velocity will have size and direction.
2006-11-27 05:54:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by bonface a 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
b and c are true
a is false a vector can be positive or negative
d is false acceleration is derivative of velocity
2006-11-27 05:28:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by maussy 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
C. Though I feel A also, right?
I mean, how can you have negative size and negative direction?
2006-11-27 05:28:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Crystal P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
c is the only answer that is always true, a and b can be true but not always
2006-11-27 06:00:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that c is correct
2006-11-27 05:27:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Genadi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
c
2006-11-27 05:25:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by jesus.vasquez 1
·
0⤊
0⤋