do u agree or disagree and why
2006-11-27 03:59:20 · 10 answers · asked by jimmythebullstromboni 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Yes, and the Germans could have won the war much earlier than that had Hitler not been a moron.
At the onset of WWII, Germany was way ahead of its competatros in regards to aviation technology. the germans could have had jet engines as early as 1941 but Hitler made a decree that any research project that would take more than a year to complete should be scraped. He figured they would have won by that time so why waste the money. It turns out it took them much longer than a year to do what they had initially planned. By the time they realized this it was too late and they didn't get thier jet engines until 1945. By this time it was way too late.
Had the Germans gotten thier jet engines earlier they would have easily cleaned up during the battle of Britain and would have free reign.
2006-11-27 04:46:57 · answer #1 · answered by Diddytron 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that's no longer so straight forward as declaring the Soviets or the human beings gained the conflict in Europe. The conflict consisted of better than only a floor conflict. The Soviets tied up the vast majority of the Wehrmacht and the SS, on the jap the front and Britain and the U.S. tied up fairly some the Luftwaffe with their strategic bombing campaigns, giving the Soviets air superiority on the jap the front, and seriously negative Germany's ability to make conflict by destroying their business features. human beings commonly forget the contribution that the Poles made to victory. They were the first to break German communications codes and ciphers. Operation Overlord drew forces far flung from the jap the front, and helped to % up Germany's defeat. The Soviet Union contributed little or no to victory over the jap.
2016-11-29 20:25:57 · answer #2 · answered by plyler 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that it was only a matter of time before one of the two would start a war either the Germans, either the Soviet Union would have started the war.
The nazis and communists worked together but did not trust each other. As long as they had some benefits like destroying Poland, it worked but in long term ....
2006-11-27 09:02:00 · answer #3 · answered by Rik 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 3 million men of the Werhmact that were available for the start of Operation Barbarossa would've been freed up to withstand anything the Western allies could send against them. The Western allies' only hope, at the point, was "Little Boy" and "Fat Man"....who were originally destined for the European theatre anyway. These two bombs and the industrial might of the US would've prevailed in the long run.
2006-11-27 05:36:38 · answer #4 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without oil supplies, the Germans were bound to lose.
Either Rommel had to beat Montgomery in Egypt and reach Saudi Arabia, or the Eastern Front had to reach the Russian oilfields around the Caspian. One would have been enough, but neither of them happened.
2006-11-27 05:05:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the better question would be would germany have won if japan hadnt attacked the US like the germans asked them not too...
2006-11-27 12:42:35 · answer #6 · answered by thedragonalthor 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so -- the Western Front was a mess and thousands of soldiers died from both sides. The winter was brutal. Even so, I still think that the ambitions of the Nazis would have been stifled ultimately. Now, Japan ... they really did a number on China...
2006-11-27 04:02:34 · answer #7 · answered by wrathofkublakhan 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The Germans wouldn't have won the war. It might have taken longer to defeat them but they would lose for sure.
2006-11-27 04:31:14 · answer #8 · answered by Sunshine Suzy 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If the Germans and the Japanese had won then they would have fought with each other.
2006-11-27 04:09:11 · answer #9 · answered by Jabberwock 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yeh i guess but we r to strong for them
2006-11-27 04:01:00 · answer #10 · answered by nick s 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋