Let me ask you guys a question?

Question

There is this thing of Chelsea capable of buying great players and having a full team.Most people forget that Man United is still the second richest team in the world and can afford as many players as any team but why do people keep saying Chelsea are buying players and Champiionships.Man United can buy any player they want they too can afford it.Example Alex Ferguson is making a bid for Fernando Torres worth 25million pounds that is just 5million less than Shevchencho.And they have aready bought Carrick for 18 million pounds and making a bid for Hagreaves worth about 15 million pounds which in total is about 62million pounds.This shows that if we would have succeded in getting these players we would have spent 62million pounds on players during the transfer period which is maybe more than what Chelsea spent.Then look at Old Trafford how big it is and how expensive tickets are with the expansion to 76000.We are still the team with the highest revenue in Englandso i think we can compete

Please can you guys answer this question with seriousness.

Please you guys are not answering the question what i mean is that.Man United are also capable of splashing money for expensive players, they are the second richest club.Ok does it mean Man United cannot afford players worth any amount? They can.

Answer 1

Hey man, are you really that excited about watching grown men run around and kick a ball?

Answer 2

Hei MU Rule.

Firstly, I don’t think that money can really buy you Championships. YES, it sure does help, that it can build a squad with much depth.

Take for instance the Man Utd Chelsea game. MU could only substitute with Fletcher and Oshea, while Chelsea could field the likes if Robben and Cole. What more, they had 20 million pound Shaun Wright Phillips not even on the bench.

In the long run, when the hecticness of games and schedules, takes its toll, and the injuries numbers up, Chelsea would definitely be the stronger squad. Not forgetting the occasional suspensions as well. Man Utd is not such a force without Giggs, Scholes, Rooney or Ferdinand. Chelsea could easily replace anyone in any position.

With the $ Chelsea have, they could also secure promising youngsters to their club. Like how they snatch Obi Mikel from Man Utd. This would definitely help in the future of the club.

However, at the end of the day, you still need the squad to gel up. Ballack and Andrei S. have still not proven to be world class players at Chelsea yet. Jack Walker with with all his millions for Blackburn in the 90s only saw them win One Premiership. The same goes for Real Madrid.

Man Utd with the Fergie Fledgings won numerous titles without splashing out explicit amounts of $.

Having said all the above, I would still say, YES, money is indeed important to any club. You do however, have to splash it out wisely, in the many various department tht the club need , and not only on players, to help you win the Premiership.


Peace out…..

Answer 3

I think the difference is that Man Utd go for players who Ferguson thinks will enhance the team whereas Chelsea buy players just to stop anyone else getting them. I agree that Man Utd can compete with Chelsea in the transfer market but United are also very keen on bringing young players through whereas Chelsea do not seem bothered in doing this.

Answer 4

for years it was Arsenal and Man U that would compete for the title the rest would fight for any euro place they could, with mostly Man U paying and getting the best players now there is Chelsea in the throw, which i think is good as whoever wins the league proves that they have a great manager to not just someone who buy's all the best players and hopes for the best (Real Madrid). in Alex Ferguson you have a manager who is from the old school and then there is Jose who the media love coz of his straight talking, Man U are a rich team and the thing is they can afford to be, while Chelsea are bankrolled by one person, who runs the club at a massive loss that the difference in spending 62 million.

18 million for Carrick but, Spurs must be laughing there napper off, now that is well OVER PRICED

Answer 5

man utd can compete for the title as you said they are the second richest club but chelsea pay more wages than man utd so most of players dream to play with chelsea also sir alex ferguson is making problems with players in his squad dont forget that he was the main reason that made beckam and vannistelrooy leave man utd i believe that man united will be better without sir alex

Answer 6

huh? i dun really get what u are trying to ask. sure man utd has lots of money jux look at their stadium.. chelsea could upgrade anytime that one. but jose i think wants to build the best chelsea team. making his dreams for chelsea to reality.

Answer 7

man u or chelsea cant buy a european cup!!!!
come on the pool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 8

man untd ruleeeeeeeee!!!!!

x...X...x15yr old gurl UKx...X...x