Where's the confusion. When you take a creator out of the equation, we all become animals.
It becomes arrogant to assume humans have some intrinsic importance.
Personally, I do not think the liberals should get to have dominion over this issue.
As stewards, I think conservatives need to show more interest in public support of some conservationist efforts. Many of us just do so quietly, without fanfare.
2006-11-27 01:18:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
i'm an environmentalist and believe in animal rights yet on the comparable time don't think animals could have any greater rights as human beings. they could be equivalent in rights not greater or much less. Now as you have aptly talked approximately there is definitely a organic order of issues. i believe this organic involves not taking any greater from nature than is needed. If we choose meat for survival then it somewhat is comprehensible. I whether think of that the final public of the international is at a place wherein they'd forgo meat and somewhat be the fit for it. As some important facet reward it may help to alleviate a mass quantity of suffering besides as take the pressures off the ambience that produces meat motives. Now i don't understand what you're bearing on while it includes blowing issues out of share. I even have heard PETA is against issues like seeing eye dogs and that i agree it somewhat is quite stupid. yet encouraging society to make compassionate and conscious selections is something yet stupid. IMO it somewhat is one step closer to enlightenment.
2016-10-13 05:01:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I sincerely hope that you are not saying that caring about animals only comes naturally to liberals. Or for that matter caring about trees, or shall I say the environment? Many of us care and do our part, but don't feel the need to broadcast what we are doing. What exactly have you done to protect animals or trees?
2006-11-27 02:08:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, become a Liberal, not some Conservative coward posing as one. After than, show actual care for animals and trees, don't mock those who mutually respect nature (not speaking as one of them). Afterwards, if you still have questions, as such. Don't waste my own or others time.
2006-11-27 01:50:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Huey Freeman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
In all fairness, I don't really believe that you do that.
But it does seem that way to most people.
The reason is that a lot of you are very vocal about trees and
animals. The Trees I can understand but not the animals so much.
Thank you very much, while you're up.
2006-11-27 01:25:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by producer_vortex 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well, humans are destroying the planet something animals and plants do not do.
What makes us more special than any other organism?
2006-11-27 01:35:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by LatexSolarBeef 4
·
0⤊
1⤋