English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-26 21:48:05 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

14 answers

its a success for the world I'd say

2006-11-26 21:51:16 · answer #1 · answered by passion_fruitx 2 · 2 2

In case you forgot, George W Bush WON the last two elections in which he was a candidate. It is not possible to fail in an election if you are not on the ballot. If you have paid any attention to the recently elected Democrats in the last 3 weeks, you should know they suddenly 'discovered' pulling out of Iraq is not such a good idea.

What was your question?

2006-11-27 14:10:29 · answer #2 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0 0

Bush is a failure; his handling of Iraq is also.
I care more about our soldiers than the Iraqis; the Iraqis perhaps do not want a western democracy, it's a real possibility. In fact, they might really want an Islamic state.
Bush's public policy is that the Iraqis should govern themselves. So if that leaves them with a theocratic government, then Bush's public policy is fulfilled although not AT ALL the way we want it.

2006-11-27 05:16:12 · answer #3 · answered by txwebber 3 · 0 0

We should all be glad that America, is when all is said and done a DEMOCRATIC country. Many Americans - in fact the MAJORITY- found Bush, etc just as embarrassing as the rest of the world did.

I'm hopeful that America will soon be respected once again by the international community. What always amazes me is how that bunch of religious crackpots got into power in the first place.

Iraq is no better now, but it's certainly no WORSE. we all get the government we deserve.

2006-11-26 21:59:28 · answer #4 · answered by Not Ecky Boy 6 · 2 1

It's a success for Iran, the epi-center for all terrorist movement). They are hoping for a 'peace-pushing bleeding heart' who they can lull into a state of false assurance. They will indirectly back the main candidate for less arms & peace as they plot to strike within 2-3 yrs. Something Bush had right is this problem IS SERIOUS.

2006-11-27 03:48:57 · answer #5 · answered by spareo1 4 · 1 0

one million) real, this is not over. yet while this is showing progression, that would show that Republican management in a time of conflict substitute into working, and that the technique substitute into working. because of the fact the Democratic base would not like the Republican technique, it somewhat is interior the Democrat's ultimate interest to make the Republican technique seem undesirable, and regrettably we choose each American's help to insure that would not ensue, mutually with Dems. 2) hypothesis, of all that talk on the subject of the lies none have data. Democratic management in government would not say this, why do you? and that they lie approximately each thing.

2016-10-13 04:53:07 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I disagree with the premise of your question. President Bush is not a failure. Republicans lost control of Congress because they became Democrat-lite over the years. The new Democrats won by espousing conservative values which were abandoned by Republicans who got voted out.

Al Quaeda may think the election outcome favors their cause. They know the majority of Democrats are cowards when it comes to war. They think Congress will now vote to pull out of Iraq. George Bush is still President, so continuing the war will be his responsibility alone.

2006-11-26 21:53:35 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 3 4

proof positve that late night tv isnt the source of good politcal education....ok...LAST TIME HERE...this wasnt a vote for democrats , it was a vote of frustration on iraq...the problem is, and liberals dont understand this, the fix for iraq is not easy or quick...and al qaeda will fight you any where you want to go. the idea that if were out of iraq thats a success is not only ludicrous...its dangerous...have we learned nothing from south viet nam?

2006-11-26 22:00:18 · answer #8 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 2

Unless you define success in Iraq as total anarchy and civil war, the answer is no.

2006-11-26 21:57:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

President Bush ran for nothing and if liberals get their way Iraq will have cival war. everyone loses all the way around.

2006-11-26 23:47:16 · answer #10 · answered by karl k 6 · 1 2

I think the American people were frustrated with the direction of this conflict and wants change. We either should win it, or leave.

2006-11-26 21:49:22 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers