"True" as in approaching --------> "Absolute".
2006-11-26 18:57:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I wish I could hear Helen Keller's answer to this question. I think she would say that it is not attainable, and not to be desired.
2006-11-26 22:34:41 · answer #1 · answered by Batty 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why is true randomness unattainable? Both zen masters and existentialists are quite sure existence in entirely random. Scientist working on Chaos theory and fuzzy logic might agree. Is it because, we, as human beings, are pattern seekers? Because we construct connections where they may not exist? In that case, yes, true isolation would be impossible. Because even if you blind yourself, go deaf, and cut yourself off from all other sensory input, you would still carry in your mind all the people you've known. And if you knew no one, you would come up with some.
2006-11-27 03:10:32 · answer #2 · answered by Rico Toasterman JPA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great question!!
There is no two in reality...... that is to say that two real things can not be the same absolutely.......wouldn't that mean absolute isolation is the reality? Food for thought, I believe!!
2006-11-27 04:13:10 · answer #3 · answered by small 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
true isolation-unattainable. true randomness-is attainable
2006-11-30 02:19:24 · answer #4 · answered by kori22 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
true isolation, psychologically attainable but not physically...
true randomness, no.
2006-11-27 06:01:46 · answer #5 · answered by lorivs89 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe in absolute!
I if you do then there is no hope!
No hope, no dream, no dream your dead!
2006-11-27 03:18:15 · answer #6 · answered by MissChatea 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋