Okay, it's been a looooooong time since I had to use my chemistry skills, so lets see what I have:
Copper is more magnetic with electrons than silver is because it's electrons (with fewer of them) are close to the nucleus (or whatever you call it) of the element. Silver is more apt to lose its electrons with them being so far away.
Copper is more often found in a +2 state. So I'd say that's a safe bet to go with. I'd only assume a +1 state if your teacher said so.
So therefore: 2AgNO3 + Cu -> Cu(NO3)2 + 2 Ag would probably be your best bet.
But once again, it's been a long time since I used this so I don't know how right I might be.
2006-11-26 18:56:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/KS8CM
copper II is a plus two ion. when it is combined with nitrate a negative one ion, it takes two negative nitrates to equal the plus two of the copper. Cu(NO3)2 We must balance: Cu + AgNO3 = Cu(NO3)2 + Ag We need 2 NO3 on the left to balance the 2 on the right Cu + 2AgNO3 = Cu(NO3)2 + Ag and now we need to put a 2 in front of the Ag on the right
2016-03-27 00:44:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
If you combine AgNO3 and Cu, what will be the products? Will it be Cu(NO3)2 and Ag? or CuNO3 and Ag?
We had a quiz on Calorimetry, I wasn't sure if my balanced equation was correct. My balanced equation was 2AgNO3 + Cu -> Cu(NO3)2 + 2Ag. Is this correct? Or should I have written AgNO3+ Cu -> CuNO3 + Ag? PLS HELP ME!!! I realy do not know what oxidation no. of Cu to use (+1 or +2) I hope...
2015-08-16 15:50:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Agno3 Cu
2016-12-17 13:19:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cu Agno3
2016-10-05 06:14:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by luff 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very good point...
Cu(+2) is more stable in water than Cu(+) so I think you should have Cu(+2). However I think, but could be wrong, that actually the standard potential of the reaction actually favours Cu(+)...
Nonetheless in several sites I saw the reaction giving Cu(+2).
Here is a nice one
http://jchemed.chem.wisc.edu/jcesoft/cca/CCA1/R1MAIN/CD1R1970.HTM
[Edit] I looked again at the standard potentials and actually the reaction to Cu(+2) is more favoured (E0 total reaction 0.458 Volt when Cu(+2) is produced vs 0.279 Volt for the case of Cu(+))
2006-11-26 23:10:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by bellerophon 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, the equation is already balanced. To answer your question in you additional details: Copper(II) means that you have 1 Cu but it is a +2 charge. For example, Copper(III) means that the Cu has a +3 charge.
2016-03-13 10:00:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Marion 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Silver is higher than copper on the electrochemical series, so in theory the copper metal would release its electrons to silver. However, their V0 values, being so close, means that the probability of the reaction actually occuring is quite low. Nonetheless:
Cu + 2AgNO3 --> 2Ag + Cu(NO3)2
1/2 Equations:
Cu(s) --> Cu2+(aq) + 2e
2Ag+(aq/l) + 2e --> 2Ag(s)
2006-11-26 18:42:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The valence of copper, is -2
NO3 is one.
So it would be Cu+ 2 NO3
2006-11-26 18:40:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by b r 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
This is a simple single replacement reaction, that's all it is. You will get:
AgNO3 + Cu -> CuNO3 + Ag (precipated)
Don't try to make things hard. It is a very simple formula, but you make it hard by assuming Cu+2 instead of Cu+1. And it really doesn't matter anyway, as it is the Ag precipitate that matters most.
2006-11-26 20:22:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by MrZ 6
·
0⤊
2⤋