If you really think there is NO conspiracy to 9/11, what about building 7?

Question

And the pentagon scenario as well. What is your take?

OK. But I watched Alex Jones' Martial Law 9/11, and it showed an interview with Larry Silverstien on PBS, where he stated that building 7 was "pulled"- (a controlled demolition). Why pull it on that day? We can do without all the lousy insults, by the way.

Answer 1

That a TERRORIST Attack occurred, and our Pentagon was hit, the building was seriously damaged, people lost their lives, and ...


THAT is EXACTLY What happened.

Answer 2

The was a conspiracy. But our government had nothing to do with it.

One thing the conspiracy nuts can't explain is how a 'controlled' demolition was about to be done in the time allowed. Dropping a building takes a lot of time to rig. The building has to be structually weakened and charges planted. And you don't do all of this without people noticing something is going on.

Answer 3

911 conspiracy theory lies too. Would you like examples?

Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ Note the quotation around ‘suspects.’ This article is about possibility of mistaken identity of hijack suspects. It appears hijackers may have stolen someone else's IDs and passports. Criminals stealing IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.”
You can read the entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1...
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’
Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears.

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm...... Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/... Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building? Several light poles were knocked down in parking lot. Did single missile swerve around in mad circile before hitting pentagon? Or may be planes wings took out bunch light poles. They also have photos of plane parts, engines...etc.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? If you wanted to go to Iraq War… Would you rig 3 buildings for demolition secretly for months and months, plan elaborate hijacks and other plots for possibly years ahead? Or would you tell intelligence agency to dig up evidence for WMD in Iraq?

Answer 4

It fell down because it was damaged when several thousand tons of stuff fell right next to it. Also it was on fire. And your crazy to believe anything other than that.

Answer 5

PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES NEED LIBRIUM.

Answer 6

Stop the NWO!!!!

Answer 7

and who shot JR?