2006-11-26 16:28:18 · 8 answers · asked by Reardon 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
They should have stuck with Peter Jackson, and by the way RAW DIVA, the hobbit comes before THE LORD OF THE RINGS, so THE HOBBIT is a prequel, not more of the lord of the rings. did you ever read the books as a kid???
2006-11-26 18:05:05 · answer #1 · answered by toddlr70 2 · 16⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't say that I'm outraged, but I am disappointed. It's a shame that the whole thing has to end like that. It's not about his ability to direct or how they want the movie to be made. It's about a dispute over payouts for Fellowship of the Ring. Now the movie will be crap because they can't agree on something totally separate!
2006-11-27 00:31:56 · answer #2 · answered by musicaangelica 5 · 13⤊ 0⤋
I'm not particularly outraged, but we'll see if the new director will make the Hobbit better than the LOTR. . . some people were mad that the director changed in the Harry Potter series, but turned out that they like the new director better
2006-11-27 00:31:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 12⤊ 1⤋
I'm outraged too! He did such a good job with the other movies!
2006-11-27 00:35:54 · answer #4 · answered by cotopaximary 4 · 13⤊ 0⤋
I guess I'd be pretty outraged if I was that much of a geek, too.
2006-11-27 00:35:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 12⤊ 1⤋
Im effing pissed, who knows how it will turn out now.. At least with Jackson we know it would have been good !!!
2006-11-27 04:13:55 · answer #6 · answered by BrideofTyr 3 · 13⤊ 0⤋
I am disappointed, not outraged
2006-11-27 00:35:52 · answer #7 · answered by Susan M 7 · 12⤊ 1⤋
I didnt even know that they were contining the series! THIS IS GREAT NEWS!!!!! more LOTR movies are here to come...oh im so excited
2006-11-27 00:54:40 · answer #8 · answered by RAW DIVA™ 5 · 11⤊ 2⤋