Everyday in newspaper or telivision ,I used to read the names of the criminals belong to a particular religion mostly.Why?
2006-11-26 16:09:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is true that most of the terrorists,thives,dacoits are muslims.It is the fault of their religious leaders because they used to spread violence in the name of their religion.
2006-11-26 16:22:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
At a particular place, at a particular time, a particular set of people, who belong to a particular religion, might be involved in a terrorist act. But that does not mean you start relating their religion to that act.
It is puerile and absurd to suggest such a thing. Muslims are being stereotyped by the Western media as terrorists and, unfortunately, the Indian press has been blatantly copying it.
Stereotyping of any kind and in any place is wrong. If you start saying everyone who is taller than 6 feet is an idiot or all whites are racists or all blacks are mean, you are falling into the stereotype trap. If Muslims are terrorists or Islam promotes terrorism then why are not the LTTE and the northeastern insurgents Muslims? What about the terrorists in Punjab?
There have been misleading reports, which are harmful to society. Indian society is an integrated society and no responsible citizen should mess with its balance. Nobody, small or big, has a right to disturb the balance. Turbulent phases come and go. But they should not be exaggerated.
Nobody has the sole claim to patriotism in this country. And nobody has the right to level charges of lack of patriotism on anyone. You can only pronounce a man guilty once [charges are] proved in a court of law.
2006-11-26 16:25:17 · answer #2 · answered by ~ Voter ~ 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think in a Deity yet have not any particular faith. i'm seen Eclectic Pagan, a eco-friendly Witch yet carry no particular Pagan direction... so i haven't any particular non secular texts. in my opinion, i don't have self belief non secular texts coach the existance of those beings, yet in basic terms coach that the author believes in it... a minimum of to a pair degree. As for being dazzling... I on no account claimed i grew to become into or that everyone else had to stay with alongside. Spirituality, for me besides, is an extremely own factor and that i truthfully can not assume others to adventure it in an analogous way I do. it could be like looking forward to everyone to have an analogous sexual adventure as I do.... I heavily doubt that would ever ensue, even whilst explaining an analogous precise sexual adventure with others. *wink*
2016-12-29 13:14:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot has to do with education also. In third world countries education matters a lot for securing jobs and ensuring a better social life.Poverty and crime in any family follow a very vicious cycle. Religious leaders of all religions have to get this correct in their head instead of doing things which are useless and just used to instignate people.
2006-11-26 20:09:25 · answer #4 · answered by betelguese999 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When that particular religion is in majority it is not a surprise. Do you mean to say that this should be shared equally? Whether those criminals were put behind bars is to be watched and not the percentage.
2006-11-27 00:32:56 · answer #5 · answered by RAVINDRAN K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't about 95% of India's population belong to a particular religeon? Hindu?
2006-11-26 16:13:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
100% criminals globally belong to Religion of Criminality. You can not give the person a religious colour to a criminal. First of all if a person is religious that person can not get in to criminal activity as every religion preaches to be pious and do not indulge in criminal activities. Criminals are criminals and it is not wise to give religious colour.
2006-11-28 15:27:20 · answer #7 · answered by george v 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You did not name the group but if my thinking is right then it must be the the most populous group.
2006-11-26 16:17:42 · answer #8 · answered by minootoo 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is too sweeping a generalised comment.
2006-11-27 23:06:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are uneducated and lack of civilization .
2006-11-30 21:12:43 · answer #10 · answered by ganesh dubey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋