oj simpson..if i did it?

Question

What is the difference if he writes this now? If you dont want to read it dont buy it. I followed the trial and would have loved to read the end...either way

Answer 1

I think OJ did kill his wife, he just had a very good lawyer to get away with it.....he should rot in a cell for the rest of his life not writing books, and getting more money.

Answer 2

OJ may well have revealed information pointing to his innocence or guilt. He at least deserves to be heard and hopefully the book and interview will be available later as a CHOICE for anyone to either check it out or not. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or even found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.
OJ has always maintained his innocence.

Answer 3

as long as OJ, walks a free life, there will be no end.. pictures proved he was very violent 2 Nicole and he did stalk her.. he hated being Nicoles reject.. and one answer mentioned the glove not fitting.. do the test at home, put on rubber gloves and then try putting on your own gloves.. bet the ranch they don't fit.. his many lies. " i don't own those ugly azz shoes.. those shoe prints were found at the scene.. later someone found a picture of OJ, wearing those same ugly azz shoes before the murders.. OJ will tell the truth, if he has 2 lie 2 do it.. he lost a lot of respect from all of us, the night he decided 2 become a killer..

Answer 4

The difference is that he will make alot of money off of writing a book about how if he did it, he would have done it. Its sick to write a book about how he killed the mother of his children, & its disgusting for him to make money from it, & its a slap in the face to Nicole's & Ron's family. I followed the trial too, but a book by O.J., no way!!!!

Answer 5

OJ Simpson is living proof money talks and BS walks.

Their is a special little corner in hell for that man.
Those people did not deserve to die! They were not innocent people, yet they were murder victims.

I continue to pray for his children. May they growup to be free from all the influence of him and be loved.

Answer 6

It was too idiotic. Splash journalism made it protestable. Money was the issue for exploitation. Bad taste, sad taste. This simply is not an opinion. It is an affront to the rational brain.

Answer 7

I agree with u there.. dont buy it!!! Why would anyone want to line the pockets of a murderer?? If he didnt do it.. then why write a "fictional" story of how he would have done it, could have done it, should have done it? Please people, grow up.. this aint Kansas anymore...

Answer 8

i think its stupid. He should let sleeping dogs lye. However, you are right. If you dont want to read it then don't.
For the record, I don't think he did it. But I do think he knows who did it.

Answer 9

Why give money to a killer? If he had been convicted as he should have been, it would be illegal to profit from his crime. Fortunately people who think the way you do are in the minority.

Answer 10

Because it's rubbing people's faces in the fact he got away with double murder.