Please base your answers on facts, not just free insults. I really would like to understand.
2006-11-26 15:25:50 · 16 answers · asked by newcalalily 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I avoided the temptation to look at the answers before answering myself. But, I would be willing to bet that all you are getting are vague accusations of her being some sort of socialist, or too liberal (when in actuality she is quite moderate), and possibly some talking about her health care plan from the past. No one seems to have any real debating points about Hillary Clinton, only knee-jerk reactions not backed up by any facts. It will be interesting to note the differences when she comes out with a national platform and folks can truly get a look at what she stands for, because right now it seems most people don't have a clue. They just hear the last name Clinton and start yammering away. She isn't Bill, that most of us already know. Her health plan from the past? She knows that wasn't successful and I suspect she has modified her thoughts and intentions on that considerably. You can bet someone will call that flip-flopping, but it should be called using your brain to learn from your mistakes. She isn't a liberal, and as soon as someone accuses her of that, I know they don't really know anything about her - they're just parroting a party line.
The Republicans are scared brainless of her, and they should be. She's a formidable and brilliant woman who has the master of public speaking as her husband. They may say "Run Hillary Run" and giggle behind their hands like someone whistling past a graveyard, but I think the reality for them will be much grimmer. It may mean seeing her sworn in as President and then having to grudgingly admit two years later she makes a damn good one. Ah, I love telling the future lol.
2006-11-26 15:53:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
1. She is a woman. So far there has never been a woman president, and among some there is still resistance to it.
2. She is a democrat, is popular, a strong person, and is threatening to the Republicans. So she will be the target of the most hostility from the republicans.
3. Although she is a democrat, and although she championed free medical care, she is seen in many areas as being rather conservative. As a result, some of those who would tend to lean a little more to the left, might be annoyed at her, considering her to be a disappointment.
So there you have three groups that could be hostile to her for different reasons.
Personally, I think she stands a very good chance of being the next president of the USA. That, of course, will only earn her even more enemies. I think she would do quite as well as many other US presidents have done. She would probably fall into the area of the top ten, if she makes it into the white house.
2006-11-26 15:33:08 · answer #2 · answered by Mr Ed 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No i do no longer thnk she is putting a undesirable occasion for young women. She is obtainable going after what she needs out of her existence and that's an occasion all of us desire, male or female. we could be sturdy adequate to take unfavourable aspects, communicate up for what we've self belief in and then to realize for the stars. I have not got any concept why you have self belief women, youthful or previous, could circulate around shamefaced, performing submissive and be limited to being family. NO i does no longer vote for Hillary Clinton, yet that does no longer mean i won't be able to comprehend her rights as a individual to have the liberty to work out and do as she pleases. thank you
2016-12-10 16:45:06 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For one, she wants government to have primary control in the raising of children. Check out her "Children Under The Law" from the 1970s.
2006-11-26 15:33:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because many of her ideas are just not feasible. Her vision of socialized healthcare will not work. Socialized healthcare will lead to doctors making McDonalds wages and when you pay people mcdonalds wages you get mcdonalds quality.
Pharmaceutical companies will have no incentive to develope new medicines or treatments and most importantly no money to do it. With no new research or developement the science will stagnate. Out of control as the prices are socialism is not the answer.
2006-11-26 16:40:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Because she was most successfully trashed by the media in the 90's, and she is a female who might want to play at the big boys table.
2006-11-26 15:37:30 · answer #6 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I really think that people that have too much frothing at the mouth emotion about the Gore/Bush election campaign a while ago should not have the keys to the Whitehouse.
2006-11-26 16:16:02 · answer #7 · answered by caciansf 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
She supports socialized medicine, she had Vince Fosters body moved before an investigation could be done. I think she is a criminal, who ripped off a bunch of poor suckers, with the White Water real estate scam. I really don't think Bill knew what she was doing, he is one of her victims too.
2006-11-26 15:45:29 · answer #8 · answered by dakota29575 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would vote for her....some people, mainly men, who hate her because she is one of the brightest, most assertive and influential people in the United States ....she is a threat to many men, especially with a brilliant former president to help her be President.
2006-11-26 15:33:14 · answer #9 · answered by tafttootsie 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Many people are against her health care plan.and many people are against her past illegal activities in the rose law firm and many people just don't agree with her over all socialist views and superior attitude
2006-11-26 15:31:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋