Philosophy reading group. Will you vote on what to read?

Question

Okay, so, the break is over, and now its time to vote. I will not vote, unless a tiebreaking vote is needed. I'll ask you to pick and rank from first to third, the selections that you are most interested in reading. I am hoping that a clear directive emerges from the first rankings, because if not, then I will have to go review voting methods. Anyway, please pick your top three. I won't vote unless a tie-breaking vote is needed.

1) Immanuel Kant -- Prolegomena

2) Seinfeld and Philosophy

3)Otherwise Than Being: Or Beyond Essence

4) the alchemist.

5) Gadamer's Truth and Method

6) Phenomenology of Spirit -- Hegel

7) Kierkegaard's Provocations

Answer 1

6 4 1

Answer 2

1 7 6

Answer 3

5 7 1

Answer 4

1 5 7

Answer 5

What do you mean by 'Henle version Urtexts'? i don't be attentive to of any severe translation matters. the revealed version I easily have is the 2nd version of a revision of Paul Carus' 1902 version (the only related above on Wikisource) by James W. Ellington (Hackett, 2001). that's a life like version with introduction and notes, and that i can propose it for that reason on my own. yet an cyber web version could be terrific, so as that any one analyzing it by this team might have get entry to to the comparable version. yet another subject that is addressed is what form of history information is needed to start analyzing this artwork. i think of readers will could be attentive to, at a minimum, some common information approximately Kant's time, the philosophical matters being reported in that element, and interior the main widespread way, how Kant spoke back to them. Readers additionally must be attentive to a minimum of something approximately this e book -- why Kant wrote it, and what books he wrote until now and after it. Readers additionally must take transport of a few practise for the sheer innovations-numbing difficulty of the e book. i think of basically diving in without information of those issues will create an psychological journey comparable to diving right into a pool and getting to understand too late that there is not any water in it. and ultimately, what readers could ask themselves is why they desire to make sure Kant. A meal of 'black pepper' is what this may be -- so why hardship? i think of skill readers will locate themselves greater effective waiting to respond to this question in the event that they first locate out slightly approximately Kant and his philosophy from a secondary source.

Answer 6

I second 1, 7, 6, At least you'll get sense of the flow of thought that led to Hegel and the fracturing of thought that followed.

Answer 7

I'm only familiar with Kant and Kierkegaard, but I'm up for anything, count me in.

Answer 8

adam smith is the most important philosopher to ever live. Try something different and revelant to present day society.

Answer 9

seinfeld and philosophy?????