Grossman sucks , Vick dosen't suck his O-Line and receivers suck
2006-11-26 14:17:00 · 17 answers · asked by Jah 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
and Brigg's is a free agent after this year
2006-11-26 14:17:31 · update #1
What the Bears need is a good, consistent passing quarterback, and trading for the leading rushing quarterback in the league who always underpasses would not help them at all. From the Falcons' point of view, trading Mike Vick is trading away their franchise player. Mike Vick IS the Falcons, and they would be stupid to trade away the face of their franchise for a horribly inconsistent quarterback in Rex Grossman.
2006-11-26 14:27:09 · answer #1 · answered by lionheart 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
actual, Vick. beneficial he's not the main precise passer, yet he's plenty greater precise that Grossman. Plus he's cellular. think of approximately it, Vick had an greater 3 hundred and sixty 5 days that Grossman and Rex easily had recievers that ought to seize his off music passes. Vick's recievers dropped exceeded besides the fact that in the event that they the place actual between the numbers. His basically worthwile reciever replaced into Alge Crumpler...a good end. as a count of actuality, anticipate Chris Leak ot provide Rex a run for the commencing interest. Mabye not this 3 hundred and sixty 5 days...yet in a 300 and sixty 5 days mabye 2 there will be a QB controversey in Chicago.
2016-12-17 16:50:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bears need a quarterback who doesnt make as many mistakes. Grossman ruined todays game against the Pats with interceptions so the Bears just need to get a consisten quarterback who will throw for about 200 yards a game and not throw 3 interceptions every game. If they can get a guy like that they will win the Super Bowl.
2006-11-26 15:19:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well thats an interesting swap but while grossman has blown lately briggs might be one of the best olb's in the game. he will undoubtedly be a probowler and is the teams number 2 tackler. vick is a good Qb but as we saw today he can run but he can't pass. the bears need a passing QB not a runner. running Qb's dont win super bowls. plus michael vick isnt a leader and if he keeps racking up fines(like he did today) nobody will want him.
2006-11-26 15:55:45 · answer #4 · answered by A.J Freeman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you kidding?? sitting grossman would be a horrible idea! I am a loyal bears fan and I have watched every game this season. Sitting him would kill any chance he has at being a great quartback, which he has the potential to be. Right now he is not playing well, but the bears are still 9-2 and that is an awesome record. Leave him in their to get the expirence he needs to take the bears to the next level of play.
2006-11-26 14:43:19 · answer #5 · answered by gohawks1988 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why in the hell would the Bears want Vick? And to give up two starters to boot to get Vick? You are nuts. Not only do the Bears give up a O and a D starter but they get a downgrade at QB. Not a team in the league with any sense that would take that deal.
2006-11-26 15:44:47 · answer #6 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL. Grossman>Vick, because Grossman actually shows up against bad teams. Vick doesn't seem to understand it's his job to throw the freaking ball!
2006-11-26 14:37:44 · answer #7 · answered by Elminster 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be good for the Falcons but not the Bears. Vick is still a work in progress.
2006-11-26 16:00:48 · answer #8 · answered by jambi_2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uh no Vick is not accurate all he has is a strong arm and can run he will never win a super bowl, he is always in the bottom half of the league in almost all the important QB categories, that's every year!!!
2006-11-26 14:22:39 · answer #9 · answered by Boondocksaint 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no vick isnt very accurate that like trading peyton manning for ryan leaf.
simple equation: Grossman > Vick
2006-11-26 14:26:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋