Fantasy Football?
2006-11-26 10:44:29 · 10 answers · asked by Joey D 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Well, this week hurt a bit, but Boldin is a monster. That should be an upgrade. It wasn't an awful deal. Overpaying isn't always bad.
Romo has been very solid, but that game was an anomaly. He's not going to do that every week. He's only a week or two removed from a very modest no TD game.
Bulger's problem is the O-line. Why they aren't throwing it to Holt all day is beyond me. They are leaning on Jackson more.
You are going to have to hope Bulger gets it figured out, simple as that.
I would take a flyer on Jay Cutler. Maybe you can catch lightning in a bottle. He was incredible in preseason, and maybe he'll capitalize where Plummer couldn't. They have a favorable matchup in the fantasy playoffs against Arizona.
2006-11-26 13:43:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i will say that you should of held on to romo hes playing better than bulger right now.bulger today against the 49ers through his first touchdown in three games.Romo threw five(5) but its not a loss or gain that will decide if you go to the playoffs or not,boldin is good but hes being thrown to by an inexperienced quarter back in matt lienart.you did not lose much nor gain much even though you accepted this trade you should still do well with bulger and boldin. ,hope this resolves your question
2006-11-26 14:10:41 · answer #2 · answered by Bradman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Not really. In my league Boldin scored 38 points. Romo scored a little bit higher.....42. Besides Bulger is great.
2006-11-27 01:43:50 · answer #3 · answered by iknowsports 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That depends on who your WRs are or were before you got him.
Romo is good, but so is Bulger. Since you can only play one of them each week, I don't think it was wrong to trade him away for a top tier WR (assuming you didn't already have 3 great options at WR).
Obviously if you just look at this week, you kick yourself because Romo had a great day. But that won't happen every week.
2006-11-26 10:50:30 · answer #4 · answered by ezgoin92 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and No. Romo is good, Boldin is good (but Boldin has a rookie QB) so you lost on that trade. But you have Bulger, one of the best QB's in the NFL.
2006-11-26 10:48:02 · answer #5 · answered by MikeAwesome 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it somewhat is tricky. Instinctively i presumed Romo because of the fact he's a expertise and that i think of he's the style of guy which will respond to adversity. particular he performed poorly on Sunday nighttime, yet he would be resillient. Plus he has a experienced recieving corps that don't choose a perfect QB to get the interest finished. whether, the OAKLAND protection is rather vulnerable, and as you pronounced Bulger performed super final nighttime. They have been even signs and indicators life from T. Holt. See what the clicking comes out with over right here few days and make your decision as on the area of recreation time as obtainable. precise now, I say Bulger.
2016-10-13 04:11:49 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would have traded bulger and kept romo, he is for real.plus offense is really clickng
2006-11-26 11:42:33 · answer #7 · answered by letitbemetheone 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes u are u sould go get him back he is a good QB u should have keep so try to get him back ok thats all i can do for u just get him back he has TO to thow to and he has a ok running back
2006-11-26 23:13:14 · answer #8 · answered by Jason E 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uhhhhh. Yeah.
2006-11-26 10:47:04 · answer #9 · answered by lucyanddesi 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no way.
2006-11-26 10:48:45 · answer #10 · answered by goniners1000 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋