English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-26 05:44:36 · 5 answers · asked by maize_eagles_2009 1 in Science & Mathematics Biology

5 answers

Well, you would need more space for a big population. But, there are still some small countries and states that have big populations, which are somehow overwhelmed by the amount of people there. Some places like Asia, even with having a lot of land, have too many people in their population, and have to have many people leave.

I hope this has helped you!

2006-11-26 06:19:27 · answer #1 · answered by Imagine, Its Contagious! 3 · 0 0

Population size is closely linked to its rate of change. If the population is below the threshold for the resources available, it will increase in size ... The more distance between the actual size and the threshold, the greater the rate of increase. If the population is above its threshold, it will start to decrease in size. The threshold will be the equilibrium position so it will tend to wave up and down until it gets to the equilibrium. The reason real life populations don't do this is because the resources are changing all the time so the equilibrium is a moving target. If you don't know the size of a population, what else is there to know about it? Size is the very most important feature (or I would suggest property) of a population.

2006-11-26 06:42:26 · answer #2 · answered by Stuart 3 · 1 0

because if everyone in the population was really fat, they'd take up more space. so you want to have skinny sized people in the peopulation. less mass, more room for growth

2006-11-26 05:46:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Because size does matter.

2006-11-26 05:46:37 · answer #4 · answered by Hi 7 · 0 1

Because im horny

2016-01-12 12:21:27 · answer #5 · answered by Brandon 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers