English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Heres your proof:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html

2006-11-26 03:27:46 · 15 answers · asked by halfbright 5 in Politics & Government Government

Did he attack for oil as well as people are saying President Bush is?

2006-11-26 03:28:34 · update #1

15 answers

Clinton just did it for the Oil.
It was all about the Oil.
Whitewater was all about the Oil.
The Rose Law Firm Corruption was all about the Oil.
Vince Foster's death was all about Oil.
Cattle Futures was all about the Oil.
Perjury was all about the Oil.
Selling nuke secrets to China for campaign money was all about the OIl.
WHAT IS IT WITH THE CLINTONS AND OIL????
WHY DO DEMOCRATS WANT ALL THE WORLD'S OIL?????

2006-11-26 03:36:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

i imagine that's a organic reaction because bill Clinton became the president earlier Bush and Hillary Clinton is the clean the front runner contained in the subsequent Presidential race. hence, the overall public of republicans have self belief that the overall public of democrats are Clinton worshipers. Likewise, the overall public of democrats have self belief that the overall public of republicans are Bush worshipers. I have examine a number of the responses to this question and that i favor to remind those that one, bill Clinton became provided Osama Bin encumbered's head on a silver platter and he declined the availability. also, Senator Hillary Clinton said the very similar intelligence comments as Bush did and hence voted to authorize using troops in Iraq. i'm not putting forward that i'm delighted with Bush's performance. i'm putting forward that he on my own can't be blamed. If the homestead and Senate did not authorize using troops, Bush ought to absolutely have gone to warfare for ninety days. i'm absolutely asking people to keep in mind that contained in the vote casting sales area.

2016-11-26 22:55:56 · answer #2 · answered by binette 4 · 0 0

It's funny how you have a very selective memory. Republicans called this "an attempt to divert peoples attention from the Monica Lewwinski scandal."

Democrats have acknowledged that Clinton went after Saddam. But what Clinton did was LEGAL. What Bush has done is ILLEGAL. Imagine that...

2006-11-26 03:58:59 · answer #3 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 0 1

I haven't forgotten. But then again you're assuming that because it's Clinton that I think it's alright. Um. NO. If Clinton or any other Democrat was doing what Bush was I'd actually dislike them MORE than Bush.

But then again, you sound like you know everything and are a VERY understanding person. (sarcastic)

2006-11-26 03:38:58 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0 1

You didn't read this part: The inspectors undertook this mission first 7.5 years ago at the end of the Gulf War when Iraq agreed to declare and destroy its arsenal as a condition of the ceasefire. That happened under the watch of the first Bush prez. Clinton was just following up on the cease fire agreement.

2006-11-26 03:31:24 · answer #5 · answered by neilinhp 3 · 2 1

Clinton Wouldn't so something out of spite like bush would do.

Look at how Clinton helped the Us . and other coutries.
Look at 9/11 they waited until clinton got up out of the white house be for that happend.

2006-11-26 03:36:30 · answer #6 · answered by lorenzo p 3 · 0 1

lets see when clinton was in office america wa sat its best in YEARS. he was a very good president, he made sure we were not in to much debt, and he kept it that way(until bush ******* that up, we now have the highest budget ever) when clinton was in office our country had the lowest amount of unemployed people. now we have the highest ever. how is that bush can lie to his country on a MASSIVE god damn level about non existant weapons of mass destruction yet bill clinton lied about getting a ******.g BJ and epople want to impeach him. impeach bush a man who has ruined our country a man that has casued the deaths of to many people, way to many people. of his own contry and of other allie countries. i dont know much of the attack on iraq by clinton but i know that it was not a full out war like this. and clinton did not LIE about anything involving that. i cant stand republicans(presidents) but that man is the worst of them all

2006-11-26 03:39:50 · answer #7 · answered by screw you 2 · 1 1

The democrats must understand that Clinton did not finish the job in Iraq.

2006-11-26 03:32:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Nobody forgot. But Clinton didn't invade Iraq and send it into a civil war at the cost of 3,000 American, 150,000 Iraqi lives and nearly $300,000,000,000 of US tax payer dollars......and counting.

2006-11-26 03:44:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

He was trying to divert attention away from a sexual assault lawsuit. Oops! that was only about sex with monica. Not a real attack, just like a blow *job in the oval office is not sex.

2006-11-26 03:32:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers