Who did it? Was it O.J.? Was it Oranthal? Or, was it O.J. and company?
We may never find out.
Oh, damit, forgot, it wasn't O.J.
I keep forgetting. Trial by jury and all that nice stuff Americans can be proud of.
O.J. was about to give us something, it took all of thirteen years now, Sidney must be a teenager now...and Papa, well all he accomplished was grow a big, fat head.
Funny, Pinochio grew a big nose.
I guess he accomplished what many thrown out fathers wish they had done.
Where do you stand?
Would you want that book as a trophy? I mean, what's it worth now that the book deal is cancelled, and O.J. just gets a paltry few million bucks to pay some bills with.
2006-11-26 01:21:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Since I can't shine Sunshine2's shoes, point wise and best answer wise....I will say that the case was flawed, but the conduct of the accused leaves much to be desired.
This question will remain with no best answerer.
2006-12-02 03:02:44 · update #1
OJ has always maintained his innocence and this hypothetical book should be available and people have a CHOICE whether to read it or not. OJ is likely not being narcissistic and a great portion of the book is probably defending himself against false allegations. Fuhrman wrote a book after the trial as did some of the trial attorneys. Here's a few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.
2006-11-28 19:41:17 · answer #1 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the whole was designed to make money. OJ was to get money to diminish his legal obligations. He still gets his money. Also, they will find someone to publish the book but it will not stand up to scrutiny by scholars. The truth will not come out but the media will make a big deal out of it. Just because a jury of his peers did not find him guilty does not mean he did not do it. He's still guilty and that will come out when his children are fully grown and able to move about without OJ having as much influence over them.
2006-11-26 02:11:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As one of the few black individuals that believes he did it, I find it appalling that the book deal would even be entertained. What about his kids? There is a special seat in "HELL" for O.J., right next to Hitler and a few KKK members. No Black Panthers to his aide, the ex-brother is on his own. Johnnie Cochran did his job, too well.
2006-11-27 08:25:55 · answer #3 · answered by Bethy4 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am glad it flopped--OJ has no business making money off of such a tragic event. I hope Fred Goldman and his family throw the biggest "OJ failed Party" ever seen! Also, just the title of the book sounds like "the Juice" may be feeling a little GUILTY!!!!
2006-11-26 03:05:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For me this has been over since the jury said "not guilty". He can't be tried for this again.
To keep going over it again and again is a waste of everyone's time.
I think after this no publisher or producer will touch him and rightly so.
It's all she wrote.
2006-11-26 01:54:46 · answer #5 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! it would be crammed with shite purely like OJ, I mean cmon, this is in comparison to he's going to jot down approximately how great it felt whilst he have been given permit off with homicide! surely come to think of of it, he probably would not write it besides! lmao
2016-10-17 13:47:16 · answer #6 · answered by quinteros 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would just as soon forget about OJ, it was disgusting how that trial came out!
2006-11-26 05:23:50 · answer #7 · answered by Old Guy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, i thinhk he is sick and twisted to write a book about how he killed someone. Face it he killed them!! he is a sick man and he should be in prison along with nice people like rapists, murderers, and robbers. When the lights go out.........................
2006-12-04 00:12:23 · answer #8 · answered by Dr. Newton 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shame on Fox for trying to hoist this crap on the AMerican people. HE DID IT. Simple as that.
2006-11-26 03:56:07 · answer #9 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
if you want a copy it is available on e bay.
2006-11-26 12:58:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋