English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

The Compromise of 1850 generated positive and negative results. Its passage quieted sectional animosities for a few years (until the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854) and held off the Civil War for about 10 years. On the other hand, Northerners were so enraged by the provisions of the Fugitive Slave Act that it was impossible to strike future compromises.
1California was admitted to the Union as a free state.
2The New Mexico and Utah territories were to decide the question issue by relying on “popular sovereignty,” allowing the actual settlers to vote on the issue.
3Texas lost the New Mexico territory, but received $10 million from the federal government for its loss.
4The slave trade in the District of Columbia was abolished.
5A new Fugitive Slave Act was passed.

2006-11-26 00:49:26 · answer #1 · answered by Akkita 6 · 1 0

sure and no. sure it did because the hot Missouri Compromise became constitutional til repealed in 1854. No because it became repealed because the courts got here upon that the authorities isn't allowed to administration lands, no longer written contained in the structure everywhere. so that they repealed this act. by doing this then it created each and every of the topics your speaking about it really is that if free lands could have slaves, in the adventure that they be free, is there a border for slavery. It create problems with Kansas and Nebraska entering the union and with California as a state because it disenchanted the steadiness of free vs slave states. besides with this they exceeded the Fugitive Slave regulation the position union troops or human beings had to go back slaves to the slave states and human beings began to experience it became incorrect to assist them out. Then u have John Brown martyred, and the Congress splintering on professional-con of slavery. With this u have Stephen Douglas and Abraham Lincoln battling for the presidency. All of this starts to develop into civil conflict even as Lincoln is president because he became hostile to slavery and fairly some the southern states were for it so that they left the union and thats the position the Civil conflict starts. So it did delay the civil conflict even though it further to the topics they'd previously and through the civil conflict.

2016-11-29 19:19:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

http://www.answers.com/topic/compromise-of-1850

http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/histryotln/conflict.htm

afraid you have to read some.

2006-11-26 00:18:35 · answer #3 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers