When sonograms of other species are taken the pictures are said to be baby elephants, baby chimps, baby horses, or babies of whatever species they are, so why is it that only baby humans are seen by liberals who worship abortion as being something other than the species of the mother?
2006-11-26 00:04:12 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A human fetus is a human baby. And the pro-choicers are killers who simply don't want any kind of responsibility. They want to horse around, have sex and get pregnant. Then they want to run and get an abortion, saying they want the right to do what they want with their bodies. But they made the choice to have unprotected sex. Perhaps they need lessons on taking responsibility for their actions.
2006-11-26 02:19:53 · answer #1 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
A fertilized egg is a zygote. It then becomes a blastocyst. These are just cells dividing. The blastocyst attaches itself to the uterine wall. A embryo develops within the blastocyst in about 10 days. At 2 months, it is referred to as a fetus. Once born it is referred to as a newborn or baby. This is the appropriate medical terminology.
People have chastised me when I called a kitten a "baby." "It is a kitten, not a baby." A goose is a gosling, a dog is a puppy. I can see their point. Children and adults should use age appropriate grammar when they are talking.
I hate to break your heart, but conservatives as well as liberals have had abortions for whatever their personal reason. It is folly to believe otherwise.
2006-11-26 10:46:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
What do you base this on? A fetus is a fetus be it human horse or elephant. And who thinks that you go to jail for terminating live animals - just go to your local shelter where way to many animals are euthanized every day because the owners of their parents failed to have the animals neutered.
If you are opposed to abortion, rock and roll, go ahead and persuade everyone you can that abortion is a bad option. It is a bad option. But you have no freakin' right to make that decision for anyone else. Women are fully competent morally to decide for themselves.
Now if you think that most women are inferior in their decision making ability to a state of national legislative body, I guess you're just a lost cause and I won't waste my time discussing this with you.
But I will tell you that back in the day, a lot of the authority figures in my life who spent my childhood telling me that abortion is wrong wrong wrong, came to me as a young activist saying "but this time, and don't tell anyone else I asked you this, but this time my friend, she is just going to lose her mind if she has to have this baby, do you know anybody..." I'm sure you hate this answer, but please go talk to some women in their fifties and sixties, ask them what it was like when abortiom was illegal. Trust me, it was NOT the pro-life utopia you envision.
2006-11-26 09:05:49 · answer #3 · answered by ash 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
IF YOU WERE TO KILL THE FETUS OF AN ANIMAL YOU WOULD GO TO JAIL POSSIBLY FOR 5 TO 10 YEARS FOR BEING CRUEL. IF YOU WERE TO SIT BEHIND YOUR CAT AND KILL EACH OF THE KITTENS AS THE HEADS POPPED OUT OF THE MOM YOU WOULD GO TO JAIL FOR 5 TO 10 YEARS. YOU DO THAT TO A HUMAN YOU ARE JUST HELPING A WOMAN WITH HER PROBLEM. SO IT MUST NOT BE AN ANIMAL AND ITS NOT A HUMAN. THE ANSWER IS ITS A PROBLEM.
2006-11-26 08:26:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
The way I see it.
If you stop feeding some thing and it dies. it was alive.
its not important what stage of growth its in.
2006-11-26 09:50:02 · answer #5 · answered by Bear 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
When you eat breakfast is that a scrambled egg or fried chicken?
2006-11-26 08:56:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Maybe people choose abortion because they don't want their son or daughter growing up to be sent to a war to be killed by the other party who is pro-life?
2006-11-26 08:10:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 7⤋