Who came first, egg or hen?

Answer 1

Something that was not a chicken, because of a genetic mutation, laid a chicken egg. The egg was first.

The genetic changes that lead to our modern chickens happened slowly over several million years. In order to answer this question, we must draw an arbitrary line between 'not chicken' and chicken. A more realistic answer, is that small changes in the species, over time, resulted in our modern chickens.

Answer 2

If you believe God created animals first then hen but otherwise the egg was where the hen hatched from

Hope this helps

Answer 3

This is easy... We now know that all birds are descended from dinosaurs. Dinosaurs reproduced by means of laying eggs ergo the egg came before the hen.

Answer 4

A crew made from a geneticist, truth seeker and fowl farmer declare to have got here upon an answer. It became the egg. placed purely, the reason being all the way down to the actual incontrovertible actuality that genetic cloth does no longer substitute in the time of an animal's life. for this reason the first poultry that developed into what we would call a fowl, probable in prehistoric circumstances, must have first existed as an embryo interior an egg. Professor John Brookfield, a professional in evolutionary genetics on the college of Nottingham, informed the united kingdom Press association the pecking order became sparkling. The residing organism contained in the eggshell would have had a similar DNA because the fowl it would grow to be, he suggested. "for this reason, the first residing element which lets say unequivocally became a member of the species will be this time-honored egg," he further. "So, i'd finish that the egg got here first." a similar end became reached by his fellow "eggsperts" Professor David Papineau, of King's college London, and fowl farmer Charles Bourns. Mr Papineau, an expert contained in the philosophy of technology, agreed that the first fowl got here from an egg and that proves there have been fowl eggs previously chickens. He informed PA human beings were incorrect in the adventure that they argued that the mutant egg belonged to the "non-fowl" poultry father and mother. "i'd argue it really is a fowl egg if it has a fowl in it," he suggested. "If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would want to really be an ostrich egg, no longer a kangaroo egg." Bourns, chairman of commerce body large British fowl, suggested he became also firmly contained in the pro-egg camp. He suggested: "Eggs were round lengthy previously the first fowl arrived. of direction, they might no longer were fowl eggs as we see them immediately, yet they were eggs." the talk, which will come as a relief to those with argumentative kin, became prepared by Disney to promote the launch of the movie "fowl Little" on DVD

Answer 5

Older than I am!!!!!

Whooo boy.


I'm gonna give you a serious answer though. Hens date from around the end of the Cretaceous period, roughly 65 million years ago. Eggs were being laid by fish way back in the Devonian period, so they are the first vertebrate eggs. Predating that, if analogies to present species are valid, the first eggs were produced way back in the Cambrian period.



SO THE ANSWER IS *******T**H**E*****E**G**G*********

Answer 6

the egg, cos the hen was born from the egg

Answer 7

egg.

but if you are asking about hen or hen's egg, it's hen. if you want to know between hen or egg that will become hen, it's egg again.

Answer 8

I would say the hen. God created all animals not eggs. He just gave them the ability to reproduce

Answer 9

the hen appeared like a miracle. What the heck do I know. I think it is the hen

Answer 10

The egg.